Fifty Shades of Gay: How the WEF Exploits The LGBTQ Movement
The ever-expanding multi-coloured LGBTQ movement now identifies anywhere from 22 to 47 different types of sexual attraction, making the alphabet soup 2SLGBTQI+ acronym a shorthand notation. The LGBTQ movement uses the terms gender, sexual orientation and sexual attraction interchangeably, and some lists now include as many as 72 genders.
And Democrats can’t figure out why they lost the election.
Noticeably absent in the list of 72 emotion problems genders is heterosexual. It is hypocritical to claim you are an inclusive group when you exclude 94.5% of the population from your club.
We are flooded with rainbow flags everywhere: rainbow sidewalks, rainbow murals, rainbow parades, rainbow buses and rainbow police. The Rainbow Flag was first designed in 1978 by Gilbert Baker, an American artist and activist, for the San Francisco Gay Freedom Day Parade. The original flag had eight colours, which were:
Pink (sex)
Red (life)
Orange (healing)
Yellow (sun)
Green (nature)
Blue (serenity)
Turquoise (art and magic)
Purple (spirit)
Number 1 is pink for sex because the LGBTQ movement is all about sex. Everything else is lollipops and unicorns.
Sociologist Mary Bernstein writes: “For the lesbian and gay movement, then, cultural goals include (but are not limited to) challenging dominant constructions of masculinity and femininity, homophobia, and the primacy of the gendered heterosexual nuclear family (heteronormativity). Political goals include changing laws and policies to gain new rights, benefits, and protections from harm.”
I confess that I had to look up the word “heteronormativity” because it never occurred to me when I was growing up, that family, motherhood, fatherhood and heterosexual society were things that needed to be challenged. Nobody challenged the wind or told the wind it was blowing the wrong way. Nobody challenged the moon or the stars either.
UNPRECEDENTED SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN
The LGBTQ community began as a legitimate civil rights movement in the years following WWII. Gays were discriminated against and almost all nations criminalized gay behaviour.
As of 2024, homosexuality is still criminalized in 61 UN member states and at least seven of these have a death penalty for homosexuality. As we can see, the East and the West are clearly divided over this issue:
Although the gay rights movement gained much support and were successful in their struggle for equality, the LGBTQ movement is now an international cult, with an elaborate lexicon of ideology, holidays, academic support and historical analysis. It is also a powerful lobby group that continues to assert itself, backed by powerful corporations, NGO’s and even the United Nations.
According to the UN website: “In July 2013, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) launched UN Free & Equal—an unprecedented global UN public information campaign aimed at promoting equal rights and fair treatment of LGBTQ people. UN Free & Equal has reached hundreds of millions of social media feeds around the world with widely shared materials—including powerful videos, impactful graphics and plain-language fact sheets. Several campaign videos—including a popular Bollywood-themed clip “The Welcome”—rank among the most watched videos ever produced by the United Nations.”
The Welcome, posted below, shows a nice story of a gay son who brings his new boyfriend home, and the family welcomes them both with open arms.
Why target India?
It could be because India has the lowest divorce rate in the world, and arguably the strongest family bonding culture in the world. India has the lowest divorce rate worldwide in 2022, estimated to be 0.01 for 1,000 people. Moreover, the country held the lowest global divorce rates in 2020 (0.022) and 2021 (0.077).
LGBTQ INCLUSIVE CITIES
The issue is not whether the LGBTQ community should receive equal rights under the law. The real issue is whether minority groups should be granted carte blanche access to the seats of power to further the goals of shrewd, scheming power brokers.
Launched in 2015 at the Clinton Global Initiative Annual Summit, the World Economic Forum think tank, Open For Business, claims that it is working “At an international level … building a consensus amongst the business community that anti-LGBTQ+ policies run counter to the interests of business and economic development.”
The basic premise of Open For Business is that LGBTQ inclusive cities are better for business, more innovative and resilient to economic shocks, such as what occurred globally during the pandemic.
The World Economic Forum fully supports this theory, stating that, “A new analysis of economic resilience offers a potential clue to which economies may be able to recover faster: LGBT+ inclusion is correlated to the resilience of a country’s economy.”
SECRET SAUCE
The WEF wonders if LGBT+ inclusion could be a secret ingredient for economic resilience?
Quoting analysis by Open For Business, the WEF extols the virtues of inclusivity, claiming that “a coalition of companies advancing LGBT+ equality, shows a strong positive correlation (0.67) between how resilient an economy is and how accepting it is of LGBT+ people ... This is a significant finding: a one-point increase in social acceptance suggests a three-point increase in that economy’s economic resilience index, even when controlling for GDP per capita.”
A brief look behind the rainbow curtain, and who are the “coalition of companies” that have come to this genius conclusion:
The evidence is provided in a 101-page report, authored by yet another think tank, the Brunswick Group, an international advisory company with 15 offices, headquartered in the UK. The report begins with opening remarks by Bill de Blasio, Mayor of New York City, who agrees enthusiastically, “There’s no doubt that the economic future belongs to places that believe in inclusion. There’s no doubt that the economic future belongs to places that are open to connecting with the larger world around them. There’s no doubt that the economic future belongs to places that accept and embrace people from all parts of the world, all backgrounds and all ways of life. In short, the economic future belongs to cities.”
The report carries on to mention a pilot project by Chinese company Alibaba, that sent 10 Chinese same-sex couples to California to get married, because same-sex marriage is illegal in China.
Other tech businesses in China are also promoting LGBT+ acceptance:
China’s top search engine Baidu has run pro-LGBT+ social media campaigns, and
China’s leading restaurant review app, Dianping, runs a dedicated website promoting LGBT-friendly establishments
Didi Chuxing is China’s leading car hailing app, with more than 400 million users across over 400 cities; the company has run advertising campaigns featuring same-sex couples
A brief search on Chinese state-operated CGTN news, reveals that the Chinese government is supportive of the gay agenda, and LGBTQ textbooks are appearing in Chinese schools:
Other programs, initiated by big tech companies in Africa and India, are pushing for legalizing same-sex marriage and greater equality in the workforce.
In 2015, 379 companies, including Accenture, American Express, AT&T, Barclays, BlackRock, GlaxoSmithKline, Google, Goldman Sachs, McKinsey, Microsoft, PwC, and Thomson Reuters, signed a petition to the US Supreme Court to legalize same-sex marriage in some American states.
Why do the biggest mega-corporations on the planet suddenly want equality and human rights? Can pimps be trusted when they advocate equality for prostitutes?
This public endorsement, funding and oversight by mega corporations, all of whom are connected to the WEF, ought to raise alarm bells for even the most tone deaf members of society. Shouldn’t the left-wing LGBTQ community be concerned when monster capitalist corporations push their agenda for them?
SAME-SEX PARENTING NEGATIVE IMPACTS
A report by the American Psychological Association claims they have found no evidence that same-sex parenting causes any harm to the child. This is a difficult statement to reconcile with the growing body of evidence of the negative impacts on children of same sex couples:
A 2013 Canadian study analyzed data from a very large population-based sample, revealed that the children of gay and lesbian couples are only about 65 percent as likely to have graduated from high school as are the children of married, opposite-sex couples. The girls are more apt to struggle academically than the boys.
A study of 174 primary school children in Australia compared the social and educational development of 58 children living in married families, 58 living with cohabiting heterosexuals, and 58 living in homosexual unions. The authors found that married couples offer the best environment for a child's social and educational development, followed by cohabiting heterosexual couples and lastly by homosexual couples.
In a study of 36 adults raised by lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) parents, 15 of them (42%) described challenges relating to their ability to trust other people.
A study of 68 women with gay or bisexual fathers and 68 women with heterosexual fathers found a statistically significant difference between the two groups. The women (whose average age in both groups was 29) with gay or bisexual fathers had difficulty with adult attachment issues in three areas: (1) they were less comfortable with closeness and intimacy; (2) they were less able to trust and depend on others; and (3) they experienced more anxiety in relationships compared to the women raised by heterosexual fathers (and mothers).
A study in the Journal of Marriage and Family, found that “children in same-sex parent families scored lower than their peers living in married, two-biological parent households” on two academic outcomes. Potter concluded that these differences can be attributed to higher levels of family instability in cohabiting or “married” same-sex families, compared to intact, biological married parent families.
In a 2012 re-examination of a 2010 study by Rosenfeld on the association between child outcomes and same-sex family structure, the researchers found that compared with traditional married households, children being raised by same-sex couples were 35 percent less likely to make normal progress through school.
A ground-breaking study from the University of Texas at Austin found that young-adult children (ages 18–39) of parents who had same-sex relationships before the subjects had reached the age of 18 were more likely to suffer from a broad range of emotional and social problems.
In recent years, married or cohabiting gay and lesbian couples have acquired children through artificial insemination or in vitro fertilization. Research published in 2010 demonstrated some of the negative consequences to donor-conceived individuals: on average, young adults conceived through artificial insemination were more confused, felt more isolated from their families, were experiencing more psychic pain, and fared worse in areas such as depression, delinquency, and substance abuse than a matched group of children who were conceived naturally.
Men in gay unions are now also seeking biologically related children through the use of surrogate mothers. A 2013 study of children conceived through surrogate mothers by comparing them to children born through egg donation, donor insemination, and natural conception. The authors concluded that the absence of a gestational connection to the mother may be problematic for children. The lead researcher stated, “signs of adjustment problems could be behaviour problems, such as aggressive or antisocial behaviour, or emotional problems, such as anxiety or depression.”
In a 2015 study using a representative sample of 207,007 children, including 512 with same-sex parents, from the US National Health Interview Survey, emotional problems were over twice as prevalent (minimum risk ratio (RR) 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7–3.0) for children with same-sex parents than for children with opposite-sex parents.
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder was more than twice (RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.6–3.4) as prevalent among children with same-sex parents than in the general population, after controlling for age, sex, ethnicity, and parent socio-economic status.
THE GAY CITIES PLAN
Returning to the Open For Business report, we find that the promotion of LGBTQ rights, inclusion and same sex marriage is tied into the urbanization of societies. The role of cities is being increased, in order to tear down the sovereignty of nations by granting greater powers to mayors in municipalities. The report claims, “more than half the world’s population lives in cities—and by 2030, it is projected that 6 in 10 people will be city dwellers. This phenomenon is almost entirely in the Global South: around 94% of those moving to cities will come from emerging markets.”
The report shares an example of the increased powers of city mayors: “In 2004, the San Francisco mayor [Gavin Newsom] issued an executive order that permitted same-sex couples to legally marry—even though this was in defiance of state law. As a result, the federal courts were asked to rule on the constitutionality of same-sex marriage—which began the path towards the 2015 Supreme Court decision effectively legalizing same-sex marriage.”
The report offers a scoring system for cities, an Inclusion Score from 1 to 5:
This is part of the WEF-affiliated Geneva Cities Hub Plan, proclaiming in plain English: “Geneva is a center of global governance and an operational hub of multilateral diplomacy … Every day, key decisions that save or improve people’s lives are taken in Geneva. These are often not reported in the international media’s headlines but they make a crucial difference for their beneficiaries nonetheless.”
The Geneva Cities Hub plan is part of a series of global projects, variously branded with benign-sounding names like the Great Reset, Great Narrative, Fourth Industrial Revolution, Stakeholder Capitalism, UN Sustainable Goals, Multipolar World, and BRICS. These brands are carefully designed to tranquillize society with soft word salads that disguise the creeping fascism and corporate control.
It is apparent that the architects of these agendas are master psychologists.
CREATIVITY AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION
The weaponization of the LGBTQ community is an ongoing psychological operation, just like the pandemic and the climate change narratives. These are carefully crafted long-term projects of the Davos Club to push their goals in a clandestine and covert manner. Sun Tzu famously said in the Art of War, that all war is by deception.
The thesis of the report, that gay cities are better for business, is in conflict with demographic studies, such as a recent one conducted by the Canadian government (Stats Canada) that clearly shows that gay and bisexual men and women make less money than their straight counterparts. “This study examined the before-tax annual employment incomes of individuals aged 25 to 64 years who worked full-time. The median employment income of bisexual individuals ($39,200) was significantly lower than that of their heterosexual ($55,000) and gay or lesbian ($50,100) counterparts.”
A recent survey of 2,005 LGBTQ Americans found that 72% reported having “a high amount of financial stress.” LGBTQ folks were more likely to have student loan debt, credit card debt, and personal loan debt than other Americans overall, and also less likely to have a mortgage.
It is revealing to note that the WEF has no parallel program funded and promoted by mega corporations that involve the family. And this is despite, articles on the WEF website that reveal that the number one value shared by all cultures around the world is family.
The article lists 56 values that are the most common values shared around the world—sexuality and gender orientation are not even on the list.
Why does the WEF show so little interest in the values that are common to all people in the world?
It is significant that, within the billionaire community, there are only 12 known gay members. According to Forbes, there are approximately 2781 billionaires in the world and these 12 members would account for only 0.4 % of the billionaire population, far below the average of about 5.5% of the world who identify as gay.
The uber wealthy Davos Club are dominated by aggressive testosterone-fuelled straight men, and by generational families who pass on their wealth and power to their children. They are fully aware of the power of the family—another reason they are so focused on destroying the family life of the working class and middle class to deprive people of power.
IDEOLOGICAL WHORES
Contrary to the rhetoric of many Cold War warriors, who still believe we are engaged in a war of attrition with communism, the Billionaire Club of yacht owners are hardcore monopoly capitalists and engage in Machiavellian realpolitik on the world stage. They create tax-free piggy banks and call them “charitable foundations,” which they use to fund their various projects—meanwhile calling themselves “philanthropists”—because greedy rich bastards doesn’t sound nearly as pleasant.
They use ideology, but they are not loyal to any ideology or religion or god, except for the God of Money. Money gives them power, their ultimate drug. There is nothing more addictive than power, and they are stoned out of their brains.
The architects of the various global agendas of climate change, pandemics and genderology are not loyal to these ideologies. They are ideological whores who will get in bed with anybody, if it suits their purposes, and if they can use these ideologies to manipulate people. They use Christianity, Judaism and Islam. They used communism for decades, but communism failed them, because they were unable to get the majority of people to accept it. This is why they have turned to other more subtle and nefarious methods, such as technology, mass media and mRNA injections.
A friendly reminder to any young people, gay or straight reading this article: Sex is not that important. Sorry, but it really isn’t. It may be important for the gay community because they are obsessed with sex, but in the real world, nobody cares who you have sex with. It is a sad reflection on the mentality of our society, that it needs to be pointed out that sex is primarily for reproduction.
For sure, sex feels good and promotes intimacy, romantic values and keeps couples together. However, if the whole world goes gay, it will be the end of the human race. Like all mammals, human beings are primarily heterosexual animals. Young people, bless their hearts, seem to have lost touch with the basic values that make the human race vital, strong and resilient.
The WEF billionaires target young people with a witch’s brew of distorted sex-based ideology, because it is necessary to steal the hearts and minds of youth in order to advance their totalitarian agenda. There is a calculated strategy behind the creation of the Young Global Leaders program, many of whom are blissfully unaware of the insidious agenda of the World Economic Forum.
We need to be reminded it was Adolf Hitler who said, “He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.”
The Declaration emphatically states: "All ........are created equal." What other word could be more inclusive than "All"? Kind Regards to All Readers, Dave
Just say you are a homophonic asshole who loves Hitler. The “whole world” isn’t going to “turn gay” because of more representation in movies and books. You either are or you are not and nobody can turn you gay just like conversation therapy has never worked because guess what, you can’t change anyone’s sexuality or presentation just by mentioning the existence of the LGBTQ community.
And no heterosexual is not in the LGBTQ alphabet for the same reason you don’t get to have a straight pride parade. Equal rights for everyone doesn’t mean less rights for you. It’s not pie. The color pink in the rainbow was a call back to when the Nazis made LGBTQ people wear pink triangles in concentration camps. The first books burned by Nazis were in Berlin (a LGBTQ capital of the world) and belonged to the first trans research center by and for trans people headed by Magnus Hirschfeld.
Have a nice gay, homophobic Nazi loving asshat.