Mark Carney and The Gold Book
Mark Carney is a big shark in the pond, and a far more dangerous predator than his predecessor Justin Trudeau.
Mark Carney, the new Prime Minister of Canada, is the first prime minister to have never held an elected public political office in Canada prior to his appointment as prime minister. Like his apprentice, Chrystia Freeland, he studied at Harvard University. He then undertook postgraduate studies at the University of Oxford at St Peter's College and Nuffield College, where he received Master of Philosophy (MPhil) and Doctor of Philosophy (DPhil) degrees in economics in 1993 and 1995, respectively.
Ivy League education is mandatory for entrance or acceptance into the globalist ruling class, and Harvard is especially favoured. We will get to this later.
Carney spent 13 years at Goldman Sachs, and worked in their Boston, London, New York City, Tokyo, and Toronto offices. In October 2007, Carney was appointed Governor of the Bank of Canada.
While he was the governor of the Bank of Canada, he spoke at the 2012 World Economic Forum’s “Beyond Basel: Financial Institution Regulation” panel. Carney was chairman of the Bank for International Settlements’ Committee on the Global Financial System from July 2010 until January 2012.
Carney was chairman of the Group of Thirty, an international body of leading financiers and academics, created by the Rockefeller Foundation, until he stepped down in order to prevent the complete destruction of the Liberal Party, and also prevent populist leader Pierre Poilievre from getting into power in Canada.
He was also member of the Foundation Board of the World Economic Forum. Carney attended the annual meetings of the Bilderberg Group in 2011, 2012 and 2019. It goes without saying that Mark Carney is a big shark in the pond, and a far more dangerous predator than his predecessor Justin Trudeau.
THE GOLD BOOK
Seven centuries ago, in the Venetian state of Italy, it was decreed that only hereditary nobles were eligible to participate in the Great Council. This was known as the Great Council Lockout (Serrata del Maggior Consiglio). Minor aristocrats and peasants were locked out of the democratic process, because it was only members of the Great Council who could elect the Doge, the head of state. Interesting to note, Elon Musk’s DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) uses the same designation.
We talked about President Musk in an earlier article:
By the year 1319, membership in the Council became automatic for any noble man over the age of 25. This was enacted with the support of the Libro d'Oro or The Gold Book, a registry of all noblemen above the age of 18. If your name was not listed in the book, you were locked out of the elite class. The nobility did this because they were threatened by upwardly mobile newcomers who were direct competition on their hold on political power.
According to former Canadian deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, from her insider's book Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else, “All business people would like their own Serrata. And as they become more powerful relative to everyone else, their ability to impose one increases.” Freeland then wanders through some examples of the Super-Rich who have built “moats” around their economic castles to keep the proles out.
Freeland explains, “Membership in today’s Book of Gold is more subtle than being included in a list of the aristocracy, or even inheriting a trust fund. In our increasingly complex economy, the real Book of Gold is a degree from an elite university, and those are increasingly the province of the global super-elite.”
The Ivy League Universities in the United States are Brown, Columbia, Cornell, Dartmouth College, Harvard, Princeton, Pennsylvania and Yale. These coincide with British elite universities: Oxford, Cambridge and University College of London. Others on the list include MIT, Stanford, and Berkeley. The World Economic Forum claims Harvard is the number one choice of billionaires and aristocrats. Chrystia Freeland is herself a Harvard graduate, majoring in Russian and Slavic studies.
Freeland's book is a Who’s Who of the Western establishment, with page after page of anecdotes from her personal interviews of the Western elite class. She mentions her conversation with Brown’s University president, Ruth Simmons who became the first African American head of an Ivy League university. This position was capped with “the crowning prize, a seat on the board of Goldman Sachs.”
The main purpose of Freeland’s book appears to be to ingratiate herself to the Transnational Capitalist Class, by providing them with a sympathetic promotional infomercial. In one episode, she describes the super-elite as emotionally crushed by their wealth addiction: “Robert Kenny, a Boston psychologist who specializes in counselling the super-elite, agrees. He told an interviewer that “often the word ‘rich’ becomes a pejorative. It rhymes with ‘bitch.’ I’ve been in rooms and seen people stand up and say, ‘I’m Bob Kenny and I’m rich.’ And then they burst into tears.”
Only a textbook narcissist would react this way.
Freeland concludes her PR campaign by giving the plutocrats a light slap on the wrist and advising them to be “more inclusive.” Freeland is an obvious globalist insider, but still feels the need to quote Karl Marx to assuage her smug capitalist guilt:
“Marx understood the dangers of a capitalist Serrata—indeed he was counting on it. 'The capitalist system carries within itself the seeds of its own destruction,' he famously argued. Marx predicted that the rising capitalist class, like the shortsighted Venetian elite, would overreach itself and create a system that so effectively consolidated its supremacy, that it would eventually choke off economic growth and become politically unsustainable.”
She sidesteps the truth of the hereditary nature of the Transnational Capitalist Class. Most of the narrative of her book portrays the TCC as upstarts who moved upwardly into the elite class through hard work and a good education. Her revelation that the Gold Book is still open to newcomers belies the reality that it is a closed system and the doors were shut long ago. As George Carlin famously quipped, “It's a big club and you ain't in it.”
Furthermore, during Carlin’s famous rant, he explained, “They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that. That doesn’t help them. That’s against their interests.”
Wealth inequality creates social discontent, civil unrest and leads to public protest, anger, and eventually war. The global inequality we are witnessing on an unprecedented scale, will lead to global unrest on an unprecedented scale.
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
“A spirit moved. John Harvard walked the yard, The atom lay unsplit, the west unwon, The books stood open and the gates unbarred.”
—Seamus Heaney, poem for 350th Anniversary of Harvard, 1986
Why does the WEF believe that Harvard University is the best in the world?
The easy answer is that it actually is the best university in the world, consistently ranked number one by various agencies. It has the largest academic library and largest private library in the world. Its collection holds over 20 million volumes, 400 million manuscripts, 10 million photographs, and one million maps. It is an intellectual oasis for the academic world.
Harvard also maintains small class sizes of 12 students on average, and the student to faculty ratio is 7:1. This is in stark contrast to some of the academic mills that use auditoriums that host classes as large as 1000 students.
Harvard University is able to do this because it has the largest endowment of all the universities in the world. The immense external funds means they can afford the best equipment, libraries and infrastructure. They can support top-notch research with the money received. The Harvard University endowment was valued at $50.7 billion on June 30, 2023.
This is greater than the GDP of 107 of the world's nations.
Harvard has very high academic standards—the acceptance rate of a mere 4.8% makes it difficult to get in, unless you are a top student, or you are the son or daughter of the Transnational Capitalist Class. It attracts the best teachers in the world with a good financial aid program based on merit. The networking potential for students cannot be overstated—it is a gateway to an extensive network of high-profile contacts that will directly impact a graduate for the rest of their careers.
Harvard is however, virtually unanimous in its post-liberal philosophy. Out of 236 members of the Harvard faculty who responded to a question on political leanings, in a survey by The Crimson in 2021, just seven (3%) identified as “somewhat” or “very conservative,” compared to 183 who identified as “somewhat” or “very liberal.”
According to the report, Harvard is no outlier in this regard. Most of the Ivy League universities boast similar liberal-leaning staff. The conservative representation on Yale’s faculty just barely exceeded Harvard’s in a 2017 Yale Daily News survey. Of the 314 respondents, only 7 percent of faculty identified as conservative.
The irony of the well-paid Harvard staff endorsing political views that contradict their six-figure incomes should not be missed. The 2023 average faculty salary is $202,873, with many professor making substantially more, when book sales and lecture circuit fees are factored in. The other seven Ivy League schools offer similar salaries, and boast of similar political demographics.
Harvard is a quintessentially global institution. Former Harvard President Drew Faust, articulated this in an article from 2012, Toward a Global Strategy for Harvard. Faust proclaimed,
“Harvard is inherently global … The University’s international connections—including some 50,000 alumni in all but five of the world’s countries—contribute significantly to our ability to attract the best students, faculty, and staff, and our campus must remain a hub for the world’s great thinkers and doers. As we encourage faculty to envision their work and its impact with the broadest perspective possible, we will continue to expand opportunities for students to situate their knowledge and understand their lives in a global context. With the support of a generous gift from David Rockefeller, we hope to ensure that every undergraduate has a significant international experience. At the same time, we are enhancing curricula across the University to underscore the importance of global citizenship.”
David Rockefeller's $100 million grant in 2009 was established “to afford all students the opportunity to take part in a significant international experience, regardless of financial constraints.” Faust concludes that, “Harvard will become more intentionally global in the years to come.”
HARVARD IS A CIA THINK TANK
Harvard’s long-term connection to the CIA has been documented for decades, going back to several incidents where Harvard's CIA-affiliation was exposed. In 1986, two Harvard professors, Samuel P. Huntington and Richard K. Betts, were strongly criticized after an article they published in the Harvard journal entitled, “Dead Dictators and Rioting Mobs: Does the Demise of Authoritarian Rulers Lead to Political Instability?”
It was discovered that is was based on research funded by the CIA. They did not mention the CIA as a funding source in the “interest of national security.”
Samuel P. Huntington is a life-long deep state insider. His book, The Clash of Civilizations is required reading for anyone who wants to understand the geopolitical goals of the globalists.
The other professor, Richard K. Betts disclosed he had served as a private consultant for the CIA since 1980.
The World Economic Forum itself was created at Harvard with CIA money. Out of the 30 trustees of the WEF, one third are Harvard graduates—the remaining 20 all have degrees from Ivy League or prestigious European universities. They all have Western connections to Western institutions, such as the IMF, World Bank, United Nations, or corporations like Nestle, McKinsey & Co., Siemens, Dow, IBM, or they are finance or foreign affairs ministers.
They are all over-achievers, who no doubt have no life outside of work and career. They have a high level of post-secondary degrees, usually from multiple universities. Along with the 30 trustees, there are 7 managing directors and 36 members of the executive committee. They hail from 60 countries around the world, from every continent and all the major industrialized nations. The United States is the most represented country, year after year.
MARK CARNEY: CLIMATE FASCIST
Speaking of books, Carney's upcoming book, The Hinge: Time to Build an Even Better Canada, is set to be released on May 13, 2025. This book is expected to outline an “urgent path forward for Canada and the world” in the face of various existential threats to democratic traditions.
Mark Carney’s previous book, Values: Building a Better World for All, is seen as a manifesto for a globalist, climate-controlled economy.
“He’s a climate fascist through and through. The book makes it clear that he sees COVID-19 as a test run for how governments should handle the “larger crisis” of climate change: Centralized controls. Carney wants to make that the permanent model. In his world, every financial decision, from mortgages to grocery bills, should be dictated by whether it aligns with his climate agenda.”
The reason Carney is a far more dangerous predator than Trudeau is because he is very intelligent, patient, disciplined and poses as a moderate. It is now obvious, after the election, that the gullible Canadian population, who lined up for toxic waste injections, are just as easily fooled by Carney.
Today’s fascists are far more sophisticated and clever than the Nazis of World War II Germany. Today’s fascists preach diversity and inclusivity, and use the compassion and decency of average people against them. Nazis like Mark Carney are articulate, well-educated and professional. The average Canadian does not suspect a sophisticated con artist, even when he lies, cheats and steals right in front of them.
" It is now obvious, after the election, that the gullible Canadian population, who lined up for toxic waste injections, are just as easily fooled by Carney. "
The above statement from your article is a false equivalency.
The truth is that the VAST MAJORITY OF CONSERVATIVES also took multiple doses of experimental modified mRNA Gene Therapy platform injections BEFORE mandates....just like the blindly obedient cowards on the Left.
My ENTIRE family of lifelong Conservatives took at least 2 doses of the mRNA toxic shit and some repeatedly did rapid testing even though they weren't coerced.
If the Conservative Party of Canada and it's controlled opposition media actually told the truth ( which lots of us knew) to protect Canadians then, this wouldn't have happened....but it did.
The fake 2-party paradigm is what keeps the "good cop-bad cop" theater going and the criminal psychopaths in positions of power.
Team sport politics is not the solution. In fact, if the Conservatives would have won the election then, Canadian conservatives would have quit fighting against corrupt government (both sides) just like MAGA has against Trump's deployment of Operation Warp Speed and Stargate AI-mRNA open-air digital panopticon.
That being said, I agree that Mark Carney is VERY DANGEROUS. However, it seems likely that Trump, WHO ENDORSED CARNEY, helped him get elected with the perfect timing of annexation threats.
None of them are on our side.
https://truenorthwire.com/2025/04/carneys-ex-company-brookfield-has-deep-financial-ties-with-the-trump-family/
https://solarireport.substack.com/p/trump-administration-digital-control
https://www.activistpost.com/node-without-consent/
Another "election," another Bilderberg Groupie. What are the odds!?