The Cauldron of Wars

The globalists are the most dangerous threat on the world stage, not just because they are attempting to install a digital prison and make themselves Supreme Lords over the Earth.

Amidst the ocean of angst, anxiety and apprehension expressed by the alternative community, there may be some bright lights on the horizon—with the disclaimer that the horizon may be a long way off. Are you okay if the light at the end of the tunnel doesn’t appear for another hundred, or even a thousand years?

Probably, your answer is NO, you are not okay with that.

Here’s a better question: Are you okay being a pioneer of the Real World Order that is emerging on the ashes of the old world order? Because there is a Real World Order on the horizon.

I can feel it, can you?

I have learned over the last five years, since the COVID operation kicked into gear, to say the Serenity Prayer:

“God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
Courage to change the things I can,
And wisdom to know the difference.”

Facing reality is not always easy, yet we may have to concede that the globalization of the world is going to continue unabated for the foreseeable future. The reason I say this is not to be gloomy, pessimistic or a doomsayer, but rather because the forces at work on the world stage have been building momentum for decades, even centuries. It would take an equal but opposite, (if not greater) force to stop the coming events. Or a global implosion of the agenda of the global elites that would change the direction we are heading.

Unfortunatley, none of the potential scenarios will avoid some serious pain for the whole world. At least as far as I can tell, maybe you see things differently?

MODERN SOCIETY INVENTED THE GLOBALISTS

The second, and arguably more powerful force that is driving the changes on the world stage, is evolution. Evolution is always progressing forward. Evolution can be delayed, but it cannot be stopped, because evolution is innate in every living cell. This force is virtually ignored, not only by the alternative community, but also by the mainstream community for a couple of reasons. One is that most people believe evolution is strictly a biological process. Yet, even the most common sense approach to anthropology reveals that the brain development of Homo Sapiens led to greater social, cultural, economic and political complexity as human beings advanced biologically.

When human beings developed bigger brains, it led to a more complex, and thus complicated society, with equally complicated problems to solve. Complex civilizations require complex planning, and high human intelligence to manage it. As society grows more complex, greater pressure and restrictions are placed on individual freedom. This produces an overwhelming desire in the hearts of idealistic people to be free of the shackles of the increasingly oppressive tyranny of regulation, taxation, policing and public surveillance.

Is it possible to have a global society managed by a central government without descending into tyranny?

I would say the answer is yes, but not without a new social contract, and not without a profound spiritual transformation of all human society. Some members of the alt community believe we just need to get rid of the nasty globalists and return to the nation-state system, and then everything will be fine, because they believe the nation-state system is sacred and divinely ordained, just as previous generations believed in the divine right of kings.

Others grant the globalists near supernatural status, that they are demon-gods in league with the devil, and modern society is an ungodly invention, but the truth is the globalists did not invent modern society—modern society invented the globalists. The rise of a minority cult of billionaires is the result of the materialism and secularism that has infected the entire globe like a virus.

Change the philosophy and the system will change.

I have written about the roots of secular materialism:

The Mother of All Revolutions: The French Revolution is the Origin of the Great Reset

Some people do not think that they need to change—they believe everyone else has to change to suit them. But unless there is a profound spiritual transformation, not much is going to change. This means that the alternative community must offer something better than what the current system is offering.

It isn’t enough to “just say no.” If the alternative community truly is alternative, then what is the alternative plan to the WEF’s plan for global control?

HUNTER GATHERERS

Hunter gatherers gave up their nomadic lifestyle and turned to agriculture and herding animals. This was the beginning of civilization. From small farming clans that grew into market trading towns, civilization gradually advanced over that last 12,000 years to city-states and then feudalism, monarchy and finally parliamentary and republican democracy, within the Westphalian nation-state system—a system which is disintegrating as we speak.

This Westphalian nation-state system grew out of the horrors of the Thirty Year War that ravaged Europe and left 8 million dead. It was created out of necessity by the ruling class to prevent war, but it obviously failed. In fact, the argument could be made that the nation-state system created more war, not less. Over 30 nations participated in WW1, and 70 nations participated in WWII. Both conflicts resulted in the deaths of over 70 million people.

If the nation-state is dead, or at the very least on life support, what is the next stage of political evolution? Can we go backwards to monarchy and feudalism?

Ironically, the system the globalists are attempting to implement is actually one step forward to multipolar regionalism, and two steps backwards to a feudal economy managed by technocratic hereditary monarchs.

Please see my previous post for a thorough discussion of Elon Musk and Curtis Yarvin, and their plans for a techno-feudal monarchy:

Elon Musk and the Dark MAGA Cult

Some of the staunch conservatives within the alt community view our current dilemma as a contest between nationalism and globalism. They feel that we must preserve national sovereignty at any cost, because any form of world government is inherently evil and/or demonic and sovereignty is sacred and holy.

Christian fundamentalists see world government as the fulfillment of Biblical prophecy—and symbolism such as The Beast, The Whore of Babylon, The Antichrist, Armageddon, The Great Tribulation are elements that will culminate in an epic final battle for control of Israel that will usher in a new age of peace and prosperity. Christianity and Judaism will slaughter all their enemies and the Messiah will arrive, and rule the world with a rod of iron.

Sounds about right?

This end times worldview does not require the individual to change, or to engage the world in any meaningful way, because the future is already pre-ordained.

Some conservatives view progress in the same vein as they view progressives—they equate this with socialism, liberalism and woke ideology. Liberals view progress as a social achievement that requires the eradicating of all forms of class differences—an impossible goal—because we are not all created equal. People are born with different IQ, different skills, different abilities and different economic status.

That’s the facts of life.

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CHANGED EVERYTHING

Science and technology have changed everything and there is no going back. The nature of the digital medium means that we can never lose technology again. In the days of paper documents, before the printing press, knowledge was often lost from one generation to the next, or it was not shared globally. Different cultures progressed independently of each other. Inventions and innovations of the Chinese and Arabic world were often not shared with the European world, and vice versa. The digital revolution has changed this forever, for the simple fact that all human knowledge is now readily available online, instantaneously and for the most part, for free.

Ivy League schools, such as Harvard, Yale and Princeton now offer 2000 free courses online. Education is gradually becoming a free public service, meaning that the average person will soon be able to afford an education previously reserved for the upper classes.

However, it is science and technology itself that is forcing the birth of the emerging political evolution, whether we like it or not. International trade, transportation and communication have eroded the nation-state system far more than the globalists ever could have done. They are just helping to accelerate the change, and more urgently for them, to manage the change. With their bird’s eye view from the top, they see the global government coming, and they are running to the front of the parade to get control of the reins of the emerging New World Order.

Much of the protest of the last five years has been an emotionally charged reaction, and not an organized response or revolution. Even the most fervent and organized protest—the truckers convoy to Ottawa—never came even close to a French Revolution or a Russian Revolution. It was a peaceful and respectful attempt to engage the Canadian government in a sincere negotiation to end the vaccine mandates—which failed.

WORLD WAR III

One possible very negative scenario may be that we enter into another world war—that even the globalists cannot control. My opinion is the globalists really do not want a major world war, though they are happy to provoke limited national conflicts, such as the Ukraine-Russian war, which gives them opportunities for money laundering, weapons sales and overall chaos that provides smoke and mirrors, while they skulk around and push their agenda.

Henry Kissinger’s article (instructions) in the Wall Street Journal, at the outset of the pandemic, ends with a warning to world leaders (henchmen), that leads me to believe he was fully aware of the dangers of the COVID operation:

“We went on from the Battle of the Bulge into a world of growing prosperity and enhanced human dignity. Now, we live an epochal period. The historic challenge for leaders is to manage the crisis while building the future. Failure could set the world on fire.”

James Warburg’s infamous speech is often quoted by members of the alternative community, but almost invariably the full quote is missing, as well as the context of his speech before the Subcommittee on Revision of the United Nations Charter, on February 17, 1959. Not only that, but the date is usually wrong, or the quote is attributed to his father, Paul Warburg, the creator of the Federal Reserve.

“The past 15 years of my life have been devoted almost exclusively to studying the problem of world peace and, especially, the relation of the United States to these problems. These studies led me, 10 years ago, to the conclusion that the great question of our time is not whether or not one world can be achieved, but whether or not one world can be achieved by peaceful means.

We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.

Today we are faced with a divided world—its two halves glowering at each other across the iron curtain. The world's two superpowers—Russia and the United States—are entangled in the vicious circle of an arms race, which more and more preempts energies and resources sorely needed to lay the foundations of enduring peace. We are now on the road to eventual war—a war in which the conqueror will emerge well nigh indistinguishable from the vanquished.

The United States does not want this war, and most authorities agree that Russia does not want it. Indeed, why should Russia prefer the unpredictable hazards of war to a continuation of here present profitable fishing in the troubled waters of an uneasy armistice? Yet both the United States and Russia are drifting—and, with them, the entire world—toward the abyss of atomic conflict.”

Warburg gave his speech in support of Senate Resolution 56, a US Senate resolution, aimed at revising the United Nations Charter. It advocated for a United Nations capable of enacting, interpreting, and enforcing world law to prevent the use of force in international relations.

THE CAULDRON OF WARS

James Warburg was a member of The Society for the Prevention of World War III, an organization set up in the US in 1944 during World War II, that advocated a “harsh peace” for Germany, in order to completely remove Germany as a future military threat.

The group was a spin-off of the Writers’ War Board, both headed by anti-Nazi novelist Rex Stout. They advocated the Morgenthau Plan, authored by US Secretary of the Treasury Henry Morgenthau. It advocated dismembering Germany into a northern and a southern state, as well as annexing German territory to Poland, USSR and France. Along with this, the Ruhr industrial region would be dismantled, including destroying all mines and industrial factories, forever removing the threat of German militarization, which Morgenthau referred to as the Cauldron of Wars.

“The Ruhr, surrounding industrial areas, as shown on the attached map, including the Rhineland, the Kiel Canal, and all German territory north of the Kiel Canal. Here lies the heart of German industrial power, the cauldron of wars. This area should not only be stripped of all presently existing industries but so weakened and controlled that it can not in the foreseeable future become an industrial area. The following steps will accomplish this:

1. Within a short period, if possible not longer than 6 months after the cessation of hostilities, all industrial plants and equipment not destroyed by military action shall either be completely dismantled and removed from the area or completely destroyed. All equipment shall be removed from the mines and the mines shall be thoroughly wrecked.”

This proposal was accompanied by an active public media campaign by the Society for the Prevention of World War III, to show to the American people that the German people have always been “in their aggressive militarism and fanatic war spirit … a permanent threat to all peaceful nations.” This plan was not adopted, and instead, a de-Nazified, but fully industrialized Germany was reintegrated into Europe by the Truman administration.

Concurrent with this initiative, the notorious Operation Paperclip brought hundreds or possibly thousands of Nazi scientists to the United States to work for the Americans. Thus, while Germany was being de-Nazified, the United States became Nazified, through the clandestine operations of the CIA, which leads us to where we are today with technocrats like Elon Musk tossing Nazi salutes and re-inventing the Third Reich to suit the post-national world order.

The globalists are the most dangerous threat on the world stage, not just because they are attempting to install a digital prison and make themselves Supreme Lords over the Earth. They are the most dangerous threat because the negative consequences of their actions could trigger a Third World War. With the weapons available to national governments, that far surpasses the Nazi War Machine, the casualties could be in the billions, not millions.