Finding the inventor of communism is probably a fool's errand. Why not Plato or Jesus Christ? Or thousands of communal cults?
However, the British, I think history shows, used Communism and other revolutionary movements to undermine its geopolitical enemies. Today, this strategy is called destabilization.
Also, the revolutionary duc de Orleans was Grand Master of the Grand Orient Masons. (See Wikipedia) Some think it is no accident that British Masons were essentially an adjunct to the Crown while in other countries, the Masons were revolutionary. The British may have encouraged Continental Masons to be revolutionary as part of their strategy of destabilization.
The Illuminati were associated with Masons. There was nothing "Bavarian" about the Illuminati except the location of some members. Backfired when Napoleon was eventually the result?
Well put. What struck me about Poe’s thesis is not the careful tracing of the birth of communism as an ideology or even a political movement, but its propagation globally as an early international, an early spasm of globalism—and Poe shows well the British early interest and facility for surreptitious warfare by cultural and ideological subversion and engineering. I am less interested in who came up with the stuff over who’s used to increasingly reliable effect.
I liked your first paragraph and what I think is sarcasm in it. Dropping names like Plato and Jesus Christ and his Disciples isn't going deeper. Maybe you're just joking?
The rest of your comment fails. Do you want me to quote back to you what you wrote? You erroneously or very incompletely speculated that the British used communism to destabilize its enemies, British Masons are an adjunct to the Crown, the Illuminati were associated with Masons, nothing "Bavarian" about the Illuminati, backfired when Napolean was eventually the result, The British may have encouraged continental Masons to be revolutionary. You don't understand the hierarchical structure, nor the unity and mission of the separate entities.
I'm not even yet talking about the ultimate purpose. You can read my other comments on this site.
A complex article, thank you Sir. And it requires a very long feedback :) The conspiracy arena is more than anything else controlled by the spooks. So there is no such thing as "Committee of 300", Adam Weishaupt was not "a Jesuit", "the British" didn't "invent" communism but certainly capitalism - I agree, David Rockefeller is not "a communist", the world is not run by a "Rothschildian empire" where the Rothschilds are just sitting on top of it and manipulating everyone with cheap financial tricks, history is not a demented "dialectical" process where "a cabal" is just manipulating everyone but yes, the freemasons think it is - it is called "the Great Work". I mostly agree with the idea that we must end materialism but I disagree that it came from the Germans or the French. If you look again who invented capitalism you will notice who invented "the Industrial revolution" and the "scientific revolution" as well and it is not the germans. But on the other hand royals of the British are German, so... yes, it is the Germans again. Kind of. In my opinion Richard Poe is not a nationalist, he is some kind of a Republican. Republicans have some interesting conspiracy theories about the royals and the aristocracy which I value since they seem to be the only ones who actually look into aristocracy. But all of them tend to "fight communism" which they tend to think was invented by the aristocracy. Partly true maybe, partly false. There are different flavors of "communism" and they are not the same. The British empire has its own branch - Fabianism, which the Alex Joneses of the world call "communism" but it is just the British imperialism disguised as "socialism". The Jesuits had their own branch with the Castro aristocracy running "socialism" in Latin America. The father of Che is Roberto Guevara Castro, so they are blood relatives with Fidel Castro from the Spanish house of Castro https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Castro .
If "the globalists" can easily weaponize every psudo scientific ideology like "marxism", Marx was a Prussian agent https://www-wolfgang--waldner-com.translate.goog/der-marx-engels-schwindel/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp (Germany again), after that he probably worked for the British, even more easily "they" can weaponize religion, "New age" cults, Gnosticism, philosophy or other abstractions. Most people have zero analytical or critical thinking skills and it is even easier to sell them abstractions and/or promises for eternal life because manipulation works best with emotions, fears, hopes, etc. Which is why I tend to avoid any theorizing, religion, "the meaning of life" or ideology. If people can't tell 2 and 2 they certainly can't tell what Nietzsche was up to.
Back to Richard Poe. There is another author who is researching the aristocracy and the British/Phoenician/Guelph empire and who is also supposedly "fighting communism". He even organizes "anti communism conferences" and I am 90% sure that both of them are spooks. But anyway. I don't know how relevant is the argument if Alexander Horn provided the material for John Robison’s book because John Robison is a British agent himself. As Alex Benesch explains:
"It was a campaign by aristocratic intelligence networks of Welfen, Wettiner and Reginare, plus the additional British networks. The goal was to further destabilize France and draw attention away from the aristocratic networks. The conspiracy behind the Illuminati and behind the French revolution was simply painted as anarchistic and godless. None of these conspiracy books followed the many leads to aristocratic-british networks.
A new study by Professor Claus Oberhauser from Austria sheds new light on how these conspiracy books were made. The network included the intelligence asset Alexander Horn, the Royal-Society-head John Robison and many others.
It may initially seem surprising that Sir John Macpherson (1744 – 1821) played a fairly central role in Alexander Horn’s British networks, as he is particularly associated with his time in India. As early as 1767 he was in Madras for the first time for the East India Company. Several trips, political offices and, above all, political scandals during his time as deputy governor general of Bengal – he almost provoked a war – were to follow. Back in Great Britain he was active as a supporter of Edmund Burke in the fight against the French Revolution on the continent. His intimate relationship with the future King George IV (1762 – 1830) was also the subject of scandal."
I agree with a fellow commenter @lloydmillerus that finding the inventor of communism is likely immaterial, especially now that you've gone and made us start all over again..:)
Of course the most important part(s) of your post are the final conclusions. I often quote the "consider the raven..." Biblical passage in which Jesus asserts that the raven "neither sows nor reaps nor has any store of grain", and your words regarding communism and capitalism echo that thought. Our intention here isn't to gather the most resources, nor to distribute them in any certain proportion. There truly is plenty for all to use as needed for themselves while we bask in the beneficence of everything around us and learn to live as intended, needing only "our daily bread, deliverance from (but notably, not the absence of) evil, and forgiveness as we forgive one another." I guess a far more important origin to discover would be that of our desire to possess and covet resources, but I think that we can all guess how that started..:)
Thought-provoking article, 009, and equally interesting comments. I will keep it short, saying that from a cyclic perspective when integrating duality, communism is a form of entropy ["a process of degradation or running down or a trend to disorder" - Merriam-Webster] with it's opposite ideologies being forms of anti-entropy. Since the world is governed by duality, ideologies aligned to either side of the divide would appeal to different people/groups (consciously or unconscious). For the conscious, communism can be a very effective tool/mechanism against one's "enemy" (real or imagined).
Now, instead of imagining that only the rulers/the elites are conscious enough of this "mechanism", I would propose that case studies show that the opposite is true - the average man and "the masses" would equally support communism against their perceived enemies.
Case in point: The West and East supporting communism in South Africa against their perceived enemy "the Boers/Afrikaners" in that country. It worked, didn't it? The point here being here that it was average citizens in countries West and East supporting the communism in that particular country (for resources reasons) and still do. It's difficult to refute what I'm saying right? In a nutshell, everyone loves communism when it suits their needs.
There was only the appearance that it worked in South Africa. It sure deceived you. Communism can't be used in any way by the ignorant masses. Whatever they wish on their "enemies" is fantasy, and the Elite plant the idea of "enemies" and conflict in their minds as distractions.
The masses aren't thinking/conscious, and they don't factor into this discussion whatsoever. According to Source Truth--I am an awake and connected Source Player (SP)--the vast majority of the Elite and peasants are NPCs, which are only programs presented to SPs, for a reason. The only ones with consciousness are SPs, and advanced ones like me aren't "ruled by duality." There is no "world."
You use fancy terminology for communism, overanalyzing it philosophically. I don't care what Merriam-Webster calls it. That's just another deceptive and controlled information source. Communism is a control mechanism, like beLIEfs are. What beLIEfs do you have? God-creation? Evolution theory? Communism was used by the Cabal to accelerate the NWO Agenda. Unknown to the Cabal, it's actually assists with advancement of the Harvest.
This is absolute nonsense. Yes the French so called "enlightenment" thinkers could be seen as primer adding some ideas, but communism was founded, pushed, funded and used by Jews. Marx was a Jew, almost the entire Bolshevik government was Jewish. Lenin had Jewish ancestry, Trotsky/Braunstein, Kamenev/Rosenfeld, Zinoviev/Applebaum, Yakov Sevrdlov, Lazar Kagan/Kaganovich, Genrikh Yagoda, Nafatali Frenkel, Boris and Matvei Berman, Lev Schwatzman Boris Rodov and Maxsim Litvinov/Wallach. Everywhere you see the hand of the Jew. The first laws the Bolsheviks passed, were to make "anti-Semitism" a crime. (Sound familiar have you look around lately?) They desecrated and dynamited Orthodox churches and Cathedrals not one synagogue. Throughout Eastern Europe Slansky in Czechoslovakia, Rakozi/Rosenberg in Hungary and let's not forget Bela Kun/Kohn and "Lenin's Boys" thugs from the "Hungarian Soviet Republic of 1919. If you study the Hungarian uprising of 1956, you'll recognize that it actually began as a anti-Jewish uprising and morphed into a general rebellion. Why? The Jews controlled both the communist party and secret police. Installed by the USSR after WWII, and the Hungarian people had enough of being exploited and terrorized by communist Jews. Also Anna Paulker in Romania, Kurt Eisner, and Rosa Luxemburg in Weimar Germany. The fact that they claimed to be "atheists" means nothing. Jews consider themselves a "religion" and a "nationality". You can be a complete atheist and still be considered Jewish. All of the above individuals were Jewish irrespective of anything else. Stalin a dedicated Marxist/atheist I believe understood this and saw that for Jews it was never about "communist ideals", but a scam, a means for Jews to obtain power and wealth. When Molotov's wife Polina/Peral a Jew met Gold Meir in Moscow in 1948 she embraced and hugged her gushing that at long last we, our people have a state of our own. When Meir asked her why do you care, she replied in Yiddish, "Why? I'm a daughter of the Jewish people." What a metamorphosis from atheist Bolshevik to atheist Zionist. I believe this is why Stalin began to purge Jews in the post WWII era. It had nothing to do with so called "latent anti-Semitism". He figured out they were full of excrement and were never truly Marxists. Even in China Israel Epstein was a close advisor to Mao. Scratch every Left wing, Marxist, WOKE, LGBTQ AKA the Eye Exam Crowd, BLM/Antifa you'll find it's funded and/or led primarily by Jews. MLK's handler Sam Levinson was a communist and let's not leave out the Rosenberg's. Or Harry Dexter White/Weiss communist and NKVD operative in FDR's cabinet. Can't leave our Saul Alinsky. Read his "Rules for Radicals" dedicated to Lucifer. Also read his Playboy magazine interview he gave, shortly before he died in 1973. For Alinsky Marxism was a shake down racket nothing more. Bottom line communism as a creation and operating system, no matter who accepts it was and is Jewish. Don't take my word for it. Research it yourself as I've done for decades.
Another early communist was the pornographer Nicolas Restif de la Bretonne, who is also noted for using the term communist, in 1785 in his book review of Joseph-Alexandre-Victor Hupay de Fuveau. Hupay described himself as “communist” with his Project for a Philosophical Community. This book is one of the cornerstones in the history of communism. It describes for the first time how people living in a commune should live within a communal philosophy. The author explains that all must “share all economic and material products between inhabitants of the 'commune,' so that all may benefit from everybody’s work.” Restif would go on to use the term frequently in his writing, and was the first to describe communism as a form of government.
The third new ideal to arise out of the French Revolution was that of communauté: a new type of social and economic community based on equality. Though this ideal was the least articulated at the time (and the least important politically throughout the nineteenth century), it has important roots in the revolutionary era. The revolutionary egalitarianism of Babeuf, Marechal, and Restif de Ia Bretonne is the progenitor of modern Communism—and of revolutionary socialism, the rival ideal of revolutionary nationalism. The new egalitarian communalism was rooted in Rousseau's call for a social contract that would repudiate inequality among men and legitimize authority by permitting the "general will" to unify the community on a new basis.
Communism was born on the streets of revolutionary Paris. More than fifty years before Marx and Engels penned The Communist Manifesto, a faction of French radicals calling itself the Conspiracy of Equals was already preaching classless society, abolition of private property and the need for revolutionary action. (p. 51)
It doesn't matter where and when it was born in a small way. Dig deeper to learn who developed it into such a mass population controlling mechanism like beLIEfs... and why.
Regarding placing a high priority on “results” that you perceive and are always tricking you, especially distant results that you only hear about (armchair theorist-style), Nietzsche had a good quote: “He who has a why to live for can bear almost any how.”
You're a little overconfident to remark, "This is absolute nonsense," and you keep repeating, with numerous examples, "Everywhere... you find the hand of the Jew..." Yes, results, where the rubber meets the road, practical, not figuratively or theoretical. But I care about who actually makes those results happen and why. The "Jews," as you call them, are involved in communism at every level and at every stage of its development. Problems are, you don't know who the "Jews" are and what communism is.
009 stated that Restif and Hupay first coined the phrase "communist" and described its roots. Big deal. Let's talk real results, ok? The Hidden Hand gets most of its ideas from humble sources, and that's not important. It carefully takes more than 100 years to plan big initiatives like communism and the Plandemic.
You at least kick it up a notch compared to 009 by describing some mid-level actions and people. Sorry, but you're way off about the mid-level player Stalin and his purges for the sake of ideological purity. As an ancestral Persian and obedient servant of the Atonists, he knew full-well what communism was. The Bolsheviks were simply the notorious Khazarian mafia.
You make a silly distinction between purity and corruption, true communism and evil imposters--"...full of excrement," "... a shakedown racket, nothing more," "...for Jews, it was never about communist ideals," the Molotov's wife-Golda Meir example, "Why? I'm a daughter of the Jewish people," and on and on. Are you an advocate for communist purity? If so, that's sad, because you don't understand what communism is. It's a mechanism to achieve the Brotherhood's goals, like beLIEfs are. Islam is totally this as well.
You don't realize that the major and minor players, both "Jew" and non-Jew, are ordered to play their part and say certain things, even down to the local level. It's all coordinated and full of disinformation and deception. You don't know this? This is Conspiracy 101.
Your statements, "The fact that they claimed to be 'atheists' means nothing. Jews consider themselves a 'religion' and a 'nationality'. You can be a complete atheist and still be considered Jewish" are ridiculously obvious and superficial. Who doesn't know these? FYI, the higher level Ashkenazis don't care about either one, religion or nationality, because they're fronts.
94-96% of all Jews are Ashkenazis, and they're from Khazaria. Some say they came from ancient Persia, the so-called original "Aryan race." I say they're Khazarian, but either one is ok and close enough. The Rothschilds, which means "at the sign of the red shield" in German (Red Shield = satanic hexagram of Nimrod), spent big money to keep the true ancestry--the nationality--out of the public record. The Rothschilds were previously named "Bauer," and they have a long history of occultism.
The remaining small percentage are Mizrahi or Sephardic "Jews" from the Iberian Peninsula. They are Arabs converted to Judaism. Judaism is an exoteric control mechanism (a beLIEf), made up by the Babylon Brotherhood, who were the Essenes, Levites, Theraputae, and Hebrews (the priest class of Kemet). None of them were Jewish. Fake religion and fake ancestry. So, the modern "Jewish" people are double-tricked.
The nasty Ashkenazi leadership, who are part of the Cabal (that name came from "Kabbalah"), know who they are and know they have no legitimate claim to a homeland in the Levant. "Zionist/Zionism" is another tricky word whose meaning is not what it appears to be on the surface.
Essentially, all aspects of communism, including its planning and goals, are hidden, very complicated to the outsider (armchair theorist), and coordinated down to the last detail by ONE hierarchical organization. And for different reasons than you know. When you figure out the who and why, then it becomes simple.
Clock making was one of the skilled crafts practiced within the Jesuit Reductions in South America. The Guaraní people, under Jesuit guidance, demonstrated remarkable abilities in crafting complex instruments like clocks and astrolabes, similar to those made by Europeans[1]. This skill was part of a broader range of artisanal activities that included woodworking, carpentry, and metalwork, which were essential for the self-sufficiency of the missions[3]. The Jesuits encouraged these skills as part of their strategy to integrate indigenous people into European culture while maintaining their autonomy and economic viability[2][3].
Unkle Clif seems to think that the aliens he hung out with in hyperspace have communistic hierachy.
Makes sense looking at how they made us thier bitch, but much more importantly how they get us to do the f***** up things that we do to each other on a regular basis...
Clif High gives Naomi Wolf his opinion on her culture and the Elohim - 30:00
..”Individuals have been mind captured and are still doing their work..These aliens have wrapped themselves in the Jewish population to protect themselves…”
The frequent blaming of Jews in many comments after this articles and others got me thinking. The current rise in the West of resentment towards "Jews" is interesting. Despite the Anti-Defamation League's (ADL) and Left socialists' push for non-judgmentalism and removing all hints of discrimination, and news of governments now prosecuting individuals for anti-Semitism, this resentment is building. Well, a lot of it is Right wing backlash. Look at how Trump is clumsily playing both sides of this issue.
So far, only conspiracists have voiced this, but I think it will spread to the rest of the population. The Elite seem to be encouraging this by making it obvious that Ashkenazi Jews, who are actually Khazarians, are taking over everything, as some truthers loudly point out (in these comments too). Many important top positions in institutions, media, education, corporations, and government have been taken over by Jews. The presidents of many countries are now Jewish. It's not so much out of control as out in the open now.
The irony is The Powers That Be (PTB) are using the conspiracist dupes, triggering their ignorant and misplaced hatred for the "Jews." This plays right into the PTB's plans. It’s not anti-Semitism because the Khazarians are not Semites. Isra-hell’s leadership is practicing extreme anti-Semitism on the true natives of the Levant.
It's glaringly obvious the Elite is shoving this down our collective throats. Their controlled media reports daily on Isra-hell's atrocities, treachery, and manipulation of governments. It's only a matter of time that the West will turn against Jews and Judaism. This will sound strange to most of you, but Khazarian leaders are welcoming it! What? Did I just say that? Would it surprise you to hear that Isra-hell is funding and supporting Hamas? Khazarian leadership has been hiding behind Jewish identity and Judaism for a long time. Now they’re preparing for a big public transition and later removal of the masks.
They hate those they rule and see them as the same as the rest of the world's goyem. All the world's Elite feel the same about their cattle. Did you know the Saudi royal family are Sabbatean-Frankists? That's an incredibly sinister form of Babylonian-Talmudic Satanism. "Talmudic" means the Talmud. By getting the “Jewish” people believing they’re “the chosen ones,” the PTB are manipulating them.
I know why hatred of Jews will be increasingly promoted in the West. Some famous alternative researchers have hinted at it. The Top Elite already know this, like the Ur-Lodge members, because it's their plan. The Brotherhood must eventually stir up hate for both the Arabs and Jews/Islam and Judaism, not just toward Arabs and Islam, as has been the case for decades. They must do this if they want the expected intra-Abrahamic War to go as planned.
The goal is the destruction of all three religions to make way for open, collective following of the One World Luciferian Religion (OWLR), which is an exoteric version of the esoteric Serpent Religion (SR). The top levels of the PTB already practice SR. This will go a long way, together with the One World Government and NWO Agenda, toward achieving worldwide serfdom. This will also move the Source Truth Harvest toward its conclusion, which is the real and ultimate purpose of all this accelerating trouble. The remaining portion of this year and the next will be quite a ride.
I somewhat agree with Lloyd Miller's comment, "finding the inventor of communism is probably a fool's errand" if one gets caught up in all the intrigue as 009 and Dionysios Dionou do. It's intentionally constructed as an intricate puzzle.
You can simplify by learning the core hierarchical structure, overriding Agenda of the Illuminati/Cabal/Deep State/Hidden Hand/Atonists/Zionists (doesn't mean Jewish)/Babylon Brotherhood, and most importantly, the "why" behind it all. Unfortunately, none of you armchair theorizers are (not yet) awake and connected Source Players (SPs), and most of you aren't even SPs, so unraveling the mystery is impossible for you. The limitation is your status, not your intelligence.
This group has controlled the world for a long time and is stronger and more sophisticated in its methods today than it's ever been. Plus, the Matrix and entities are backing it up (controlling it). It has long been a complex web of mass mind control and "perception deception," with "the spider in the middle" of it, as David Icke tells it.
Here's a less esoteric and more concrete answer. Going approximately from low to high in power, it was French, English, and Italian Freemasonry, the Bavarian Illuminati, the Jesuits (I'm not sure which of these two middle ones is more powerful), and the Black Venetians/Black Nobility that invented communism, primarily for Russia and China. All the groups and subgroups are interrelated. The subordinate organizations are well known, like the UN, Club of Rome, Bilderberg, Council of 300, Round Table, and CFR.
Communism was created for greater control of large areas of the world (the same reason Islam was created by the Vatican), to create negative energy from conflict (generate loosh), and to pave the way for the future NWO. These are some of the major reasons. Communism is a cover for other purposes and a control mechanism, like beLIEfs are.
The Talmudic (Babylon) Kabbalists and "I Neri" have infiltrated each other and the other groups like the Illuminati centers of London (including the Crown, aka "the Dragon Court"), Rome (the "Vattis-Can," aka "prophecy of the snake"), Paris, Madrid, Switzerland, and Germany. About 94-96% of Jews are known as Ashkenazi, but they are really Khazarian. Some theorize that they and the Black Nobility (Neri) are actually Persian in origin. Okay, close enough.
The remaining small percentage are Mizrahi or Sephardic "Jews" from the Iberian Peninsula. They're converted Arabs. Judaism is one of the faked-up religions of the Babylon Brotherhood. It was created for a reason by the Essenes, Levites, Therapeutae, and "Hebrews" (Kemet High Priests). Bottom line, there never were any "Jewish" people, and these largely Eastern Europeans-Western Asiatics have no claim to a "homeland" in the Middle East. They're not Semites.
Sorry for the conspiracy history lesson and going off on a tangent. It's fun to write about these subjects. My second book (Part II), "New World Order, Plandemic, and Cabal," is full of them. I can give some good references to anyone interested.
The issue of communism is complicated, yet simple, if you know the "why." The who, what, when, where, and how are interesting, once you put most of the pieces of the puzzle together.
Until we deal with usury or the debt based Ponzi scheme that is the money system, we will forever be playing a game of musical chairs as Charles Eisenstein put it.
Richard Werner’s credit creation theory proves that money is created by the banks out of nothing. This nothing has to always be paid back. The Central Bankers (a.k.a. the Banksters) always set the interest rates below the rate of inflation so money continuously decays in value.
The way out is the decentralised, verifiable, finite supply of Bitcoin.
While I agree with the first part of your first sentence, there is no "we." You could say the sheeple masses have been and will "be playing a game of musical chairs," but it's much worse for them than that.
I have two other disagreements. First, it doesn't have to be paid back. From this year on, the world will descend into designed chaos (ordo ab chao) and be turned completely upside down. We're entering very dark times, and all previous conventions and rules that you appear to depend on will be gone.
The Elite don’t allow anything to operate outside of their centralized control. Anything appearing “decentralized” is just for show, and their underlings are the only ones who “verify” it. Bitcoin is their creation, and it’s used as a Trojan horse for digital currency, which is an increased and AI-assisted form of control. You’ll see the roll-out of the social credit system after digital currency introduction. Wake up.
There's no "way out" that you can prognosticate about or imagine. There are no solutions for the masses. They are mostly illusionary stage props anyway.
I don’t trust bitcoin and think it’s a trojan horse for digital currency, which is evil and an important step in the NWO Agenda. I know a couple who lost $800K on it. I don't mean to sound critical, but I’m surprised many people like Iain McCausland can’t see this. Digital currency, its associated social credit system, and the entire NWO will be forced on the world anyway. Nothing can remedy this except for what an advanced Source Player can personally do.
Blimey! You sound like one of the Dark Overlords with the finger pointing at the ‘sheeple masses’ and ‘them.’ It appears from your writing that you feel immune from playing the money game of musical chairs. How so? I am intrigued.
"Blimey!" Haha, I'm immune to more than that. Have you ever heard of simulation hypothesis? I go beyond that. This illusionary Matrix Game was built by us Source Players (SPs) for only us to experience and be challenged in. Source Truth is a logical and practical, not a mystical, dogmatic, or esoteric practice. It's not the New Age. I am overlord over no one and am for positive advancement, not "dark."
I'm not a conspiracist, but I know what they know, feel a kinship to them, and will defend them. I have friends who are conspiracists. They'll never find a solution and they're subconsciously addicted to the fear.
‘The truth is that the choice is about who you serve, not how much money you have.’ Indeed. It all comes down to God or mammon. But the fact is we need money to eat. And that money is usurious.
The Jesuit Reductions in South America have often been described as a form of "primitive communism" due to their communal structure and collective economic practices. These settlements, established by Jesuit missionaries in the 17th and 18th centuries, aimed to evangelize and protect indigenous populations like the Guaraní while fostering self-sufficient communities.
Key aspects supporting this characterization include:
- **Communal Land Ownership**: The reductions operated on a system where land (referred to as *tupambae*) was owned collectively by the community. The produce from this land was shared equitably among all members[2].
- **Collective Labor**: All inhabitants worked together on communal projects, such as farming and crafting, with the fruits of their labor distributed fairly[2].
- **Social Services**: The reductions provided free public services, including schools, hospitals, and support for the poor. They also implemented progressive policies like birth control and abolished the death penalty[2].
- **Economic Self-Sufficiency**: The reductions were highly organized and economically successful, producing goods like yerba mate and cowhides for trade. This success was achieved through cooperative efforts rather than individual profit motives[1][2].
While these features resemble elements of socialism or communism, the reductions were deeply rooted in Christian theology and Jesuit leadership. Critics argue that the rigid control exercised by the Jesuits limited indigenous autonomy, making the system more paternalistic than truly egalitarian[1].
Haha, you or your quoted material (but it's you quoting it), make the Jesuits out to be saintly. You don't know who they are? "Limited indigenous autonomy," indeed.
There is no evidence from the provided search results that the Jesuit Reductions in South America were involved in financing regicide. The Jesuits focused on establishing autonomous communities to protect indigenous peoples from enslavement and colonial exploitation, while promoting Christianity and economic self-sufficiency. Their activities were centered around evangelization, education, and economic development within the missions, not political intrigue or violence like regicide. The Jesuits' expulsion in 1767 was due to broader European political pressures rather than any involvement in such activities.
You really don't know who the Jesuits are, and you fall for the conditioning. Or you're publically acting like you don't know and providing cover. Either way, good job.
Finding the inventor of communism is probably a fool's errand. Why not Plato or Jesus Christ? Or thousands of communal cults?
However, the British, I think history shows, used Communism and other revolutionary movements to undermine its geopolitical enemies. Today, this strategy is called destabilization.
Also, the revolutionary duc de Orleans was Grand Master of the Grand Orient Masons. (See Wikipedia) Some think it is no accident that British Masons were essentially an adjunct to the Crown while in other countries, the Masons were revolutionary. The British may have encouraged Continental Masons to be revolutionary as part of their strategy of destabilization.
The Illuminati were associated with Masons. There was nothing "Bavarian" about the Illuminati except the location of some members. Backfired when Napoleon was eventually the result?
Well put. What struck me about Poe’s thesis is not the careful tracing of the birth of communism as an ideology or even a political movement, but its propagation globally as an early international, an early spasm of globalism—and Poe shows well the British early interest and facility for surreptitious warfare by cultural and ideological subversion and engineering. I am less interested in who came up with the stuff over who’s used to increasingly reliable effect.
Like 009, you're thinking of surface reasons and intrigue. Dig deeper and "stay thirsty, my friends."
Plato isn't deeper? Jesus Christ and his Disciples aren't deeper? Huh?
I liked your first paragraph and what I think is sarcasm in it. Dropping names like Plato and Jesus Christ and his Disciples isn't going deeper. Maybe you're just joking?
The rest of your comment fails. Do you want me to quote back to you what you wrote? You erroneously or very incompletely speculated that the British used communism to destabilize its enemies, British Masons are an adjunct to the Crown, the Illuminati were associated with Masons, nothing "Bavarian" about the Illuminati, backfired when Napolean was eventually the result, The British may have encouraged continental Masons to be revolutionary. You don't understand the hierarchical structure, nor the unity and mission of the separate entities.
I'm not even yet talking about the ultimate purpose. You can read my other comments on this site.
A complex article, thank you Sir. And it requires a very long feedback :) The conspiracy arena is more than anything else controlled by the spooks. So there is no such thing as "Committee of 300", Adam Weishaupt was not "a Jesuit", "the British" didn't "invent" communism but certainly capitalism - I agree, David Rockefeller is not "a communist", the world is not run by a "Rothschildian empire" where the Rothschilds are just sitting on top of it and manipulating everyone with cheap financial tricks, history is not a demented "dialectical" process where "a cabal" is just manipulating everyone but yes, the freemasons think it is - it is called "the Great Work". I mostly agree with the idea that we must end materialism but I disagree that it came from the Germans or the French. If you look again who invented capitalism you will notice who invented "the Industrial revolution" and the "scientific revolution" as well and it is not the germans. But on the other hand royals of the British are German, so... yes, it is the Germans again. Kind of. In my opinion Richard Poe is not a nationalist, he is some kind of a Republican. Republicans have some interesting conspiracy theories about the royals and the aristocracy which I value since they seem to be the only ones who actually look into aristocracy. But all of them tend to "fight communism" which they tend to think was invented by the aristocracy. Partly true maybe, partly false. There are different flavors of "communism" and they are not the same. The British empire has its own branch - Fabianism, which the Alex Joneses of the world call "communism" but it is just the British imperialism disguised as "socialism". The Jesuits had their own branch with the Castro aristocracy running "socialism" in Latin America. The father of Che is Roberto Guevara Castro, so they are blood relatives with Fidel Castro from the Spanish house of Castro https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Castro .
If "the globalists" can easily weaponize every psudo scientific ideology like "marxism", Marx was a Prussian agent https://www-wolfgang--waldner-com.translate.goog/der-marx-engels-schwindel/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp (Germany again), after that he probably worked for the British, even more easily "they" can weaponize religion, "New age" cults, Gnosticism, philosophy or other abstractions. Most people have zero analytical or critical thinking skills and it is even easier to sell them abstractions and/or promises for eternal life because manipulation works best with emotions, fears, hopes, etc. Which is why I tend to avoid any theorizing, religion, "the meaning of life" or ideology. If people can't tell 2 and 2 they certainly can't tell what Nietzsche was up to.
Back to Richard Poe. There is another author who is researching the aristocracy and the British/Phoenician/Guelph empire and who is also supposedly "fighting communism". He even organizes "anti communism conferences" and I am 90% sure that both of them are spooks. But anyway. I don't know how relevant is the argument if Alexander Horn provided the material for John Robison’s book because John Robison is a British agent himself. As Alex Benesch explains:
"It was a campaign by aristocratic intelligence networks of Welfen, Wettiner and Reginare, plus the additional British networks. The goal was to further destabilize France and draw attention away from the aristocratic networks. The conspiracy behind the Illuminati and behind the French revolution was simply painted as anarchistic and godless. None of these conspiracy books followed the many leads to aristocratic-british networks.
A new study by Professor Claus Oberhauser from Austria sheds new light on how these conspiracy books were made. The network included the intelligence asset Alexander Horn, the Royal-Society-head John Robison and many others.
It may initially seem surprising that Sir John Macpherson (1744 – 1821) played a fairly central role in Alexander Horn’s British networks, as he is particularly associated with his time in India. As early as 1767 he was in Madras for the first time for the East India Company. Several trips, political offices and, above all, political scandals during his time as deputy governor general of Bengal – he almost provoked a war – were to follow. Back in Great Britain he was active as a supporter of Edmund Burke in the fight against the French Revolution on the continent. His intimate relationship with the future King George IV (1762 – 1830) was also the subject of scandal."
https://candorintel.com/?p=1821
So the question who fomented the French revolution is not settled.
grrr...making me READ again...:)
I agree with a fellow commenter @lloydmillerus that finding the inventor of communism is likely immaterial, especially now that you've gone and made us start all over again..:)
Of course the most important part(s) of your post are the final conclusions. I often quote the "consider the raven..." Biblical passage in which Jesus asserts that the raven "neither sows nor reaps nor has any store of grain", and your words regarding communism and capitalism echo that thought. Our intention here isn't to gather the most resources, nor to distribute them in any certain proportion. There truly is plenty for all to use as needed for themselves while we bask in the beneficence of everything around us and learn to live as intended, needing only "our daily bread, deliverance from (but notably, not the absence of) evil, and forgiveness as we forgive one another." I guess a far more important origin to discover would be that of our desire to possess and covet resources, but I think that we can all guess how that started..:)
Thank you very nice words ❤️
Thought-provoking article, 009, and equally interesting comments. I will keep it short, saying that from a cyclic perspective when integrating duality, communism is a form of entropy ["a process of degradation or running down or a trend to disorder" - Merriam-Webster] with it's opposite ideologies being forms of anti-entropy. Since the world is governed by duality, ideologies aligned to either side of the divide would appeal to different people/groups (consciously or unconscious). For the conscious, communism can be a very effective tool/mechanism against one's "enemy" (real or imagined).
Now, instead of imagining that only the rulers/the elites are conscious enough of this "mechanism", I would propose that case studies show that the opposite is true - the average man and "the masses" would equally support communism against their perceived enemies.
Case in point: The West and East supporting communism in South Africa against their perceived enemy "the Boers/Afrikaners" in that country. It worked, didn't it? The point here being here that it was average citizens in countries West and East supporting the communism in that particular country (for resources reasons) and still do. It's difficult to refute what I'm saying right? In a nutshell, everyone loves communism when it suits their needs.
[edited/updated]
There was only the appearance that it worked in South Africa. It sure deceived you. Communism can't be used in any way by the ignorant masses. Whatever they wish on their "enemies" is fantasy, and the Elite plant the idea of "enemies" and conflict in their minds as distractions.
The masses aren't thinking/conscious, and they don't factor into this discussion whatsoever. According to Source Truth--I am an awake and connected Source Player (SP)--the vast majority of the Elite and peasants are NPCs, which are only programs presented to SPs, for a reason. The only ones with consciousness are SPs, and advanced ones like me aren't "ruled by duality." There is no "world."
You use fancy terminology for communism, overanalyzing it philosophically. I don't care what Merriam-Webster calls it. That's just another deceptive and controlled information source. Communism is a control mechanism, like beLIEfs are. What beLIEfs do you have? God-creation? Evolution theory? Communism was used by the Cabal to accelerate the NWO Agenda. Unknown to the Cabal, it's actually assists with advancement of the Harvest.
Simply excellent.
This is absolute nonsense. Yes the French so called "enlightenment" thinkers could be seen as primer adding some ideas, but communism was founded, pushed, funded and used by Jews. Marx was a Jew, almost the entire Bolshevik government was Jewish. Lenin had Jewish ancestry, Trotsky/Braunstein, Kamenev/Rosenfeld, Zinoviev/Applebaum, Yakov Sevrdlov, Lazar Kagan/Kaganovich, Genrikh Yagoda, Nafatali Frenkel, Boris and Matvei Berman, Lev Schwatzman Boris Rodov and Maxsim Litvinov/Wallach. Everywhere you see the hand of the Jew. The first laws the Bolsheviks passed, were to make "anti-Semitism" a crime. (Sound familiar have you look around lately?) They desecrated and dynamited Orthodox churches and Cathedrals not one synagogue. Throughout Eastern Europe Slansky in Czechoslovakia, Rakozi/Rosenberg in Hungary and let's not forget Bela Kun/Kohn and "Lenin's Boys" thugs from the "Hungarian Soviet Republic of 1919. If you study the Hungarian uprising of 1956, you'll recognize that it actually began as a anti-Jewish uprising and morphed into a general rebellion. Why? The Jews controlled both the communist party and secret police. Installed by the USSR after WWII, and the Hungarian people had enough of being exploited and terrorized by communist Jews. Also Anna Paulker in Romania, Kurt Eisner, and Rosa Luxemburg in Weimar Germany. The fact that they claimed to be "atheists" means nothing. Jews consider themselves a "religion" and a "nationality". You can be a complete atheist and still be considered Jewish. All of the above individuals were Jewish irrespective of anything else. Stalin a dedicated Marxist/atheist I believe understood this and saw that for Jews it was never about "communist ideals", but a scam, a means for Jews to obtain power and wealth. When Molotov's wife Polina/Peral a Jew met Gold Meir in Moscow in 1948 she embraced and hugged her gushing that at long last we, our people have a state of our own. When Meir asked her why do you care, she replied in Yiddish, "Why? I'm a daughter of the Jewish people." What a metamorphosis from atheist Bolshevik to atheist Zionist. I believe this is why Stalin began to purge Jews in the post WWII era. It had nothing to do with so called "latent anti-Semitism". He figured out they were full of excrement and were never truly Marxists. Even in China Israel Epstein was a close advisor to Mao. Scratch every Left wing, Marxist, WOKE, LGBTQ AKA the Eye Exam Crowd, BLM/Antifa you'll find it's funded and/or led primarily by Jews. MLK's handler Sam Levinson was a communist and let's not leave out the Rosenberg's. Or Harry Dexter White/Weiss communist and NKVD operative in FDR's cabinet. Can't leave our Saul Alinsky. Read his "Rules for Radicals" dedicated to Lucifer. Also read his Playboy magazine interview he gave, shortly before he died in 1973. For Alinsky Marxism was a shake down racket nothing more. Bottom line communism as a creation and operating system, no matter who accepts it was and is Jewish. Don't take my word for it. Research it yourself as I've done for decades.
Another early communist was the pornographer Nicolas Restif de la Bretonne, who is also noted for using the term communist, in 1785 in his book review of Joseph-Alexandre-Victor Hupay de Fuveau. Hupay described himself as “communist” with his Project for a Philosophical Community. This book is one of the cornerstones in the history of communism. It describes for the first time how people living in a commune should live within a communal philosophy. The author explains that all must “share all economic and material products between inhabitants of the 'commune,' so that all may benefit from everybody’s work.” Restif would go on to use the term frequently in his writing, and was the first to describe communism as a form of government.
The third new ideal to arise out of the French Revolution was that of communauté: a new type of social and economic community based on equality. Though this ideal was the least articulated at the time (and the least important politically throughout the nineteenth century), it has important roots in the revolutionary era. The revolutionary egalitarianism of Babeuf, Marechal, and Restif de Ia Bretonne is the progenitor of modern Communism—and of revolutionary socialism, the rival ideal of revolutionary nationalism. The new egalitarian communalism was rooted in Rousseau's call for a social contract that would repudiate inequality among men and legitimize authority by permitting the "general will" to unify the community on a new basis.
https://www.amazon.com/Fire-Minds-Men-James-Billington/dp/0765804719
Poe admits this:
Communism was born on the streets of revolutionary Paris. More than fifty years before Marx and Engels penned The Communist Manifesto, a faction of French radicals calling itself the Conspiracy of Equals was already preaching classless society, abolition of private property and the need for revolutionary action. (p. 51)
It doesn't matter where and when it was born in a small way. Dig deeper to learn who developed it into such a mass population controlling mechanism like beLIEfs... and why.
You're not looking nearly deep enough.
I care about results. Everywhere in Marxism and all cultural degeneration you findthe hand of the Jew as an active participant.
Regarding placing a high priority on “results” that you perceive and are always tricking you, especially distant results that you only hear about (armchair theorist-style), Nietzsche had a good quote: “He who has a why to live for can bear almost any how.”
You're a little overconfident to remark, "This is absolute nonsense," and you keep repeating, with numerous examples, "Everywhere... you find the hand of the Jew..." Yes, results, where the rubber meets the road, practical, not figuratively or theoretical. But I care about who actually makes those results happen and why. The "Jews," as you call them, are involved in communism at every level and at every stage of its development. Problems are, you don't know who the "Jews" are and what communism is.
009 stated that Restif and Hupay first coined the phrase "communist" and described its roots. Big deal. Let's talk real results, ok? The Hidden Hand gets most of its ideas from humble sources, and that's not important. It carefully takes more than 100 years to plan big initiatives like communism and the Plandemic.
You at least kick it up a notch compared to 009 by describing some mid-level actions and people. Sorry, but you're way off about the mid-level player Stalin and his purges for the sake of ideological purity. As an ancestral Persian and obedient servant of the Atonists, he knew full-well what communism was. The Bolsheviks were simply the notorious Khazarian mafia.
You make a silly distinction between purity and corruption, true communism and evil imposters--"...full of excrement," "... a shakedown racket, nothing more," "...for Jews, it was never about communist ideals," the Molotov's wife-Golda Meir example, "Why? I'm a daughter of the Jewish people," and on and on. Are you an advocate for communist purity? If so, that's sad, because you don't understand what communism is. It's a mechanism to achieve the Brotherhood's goals, like beLIEfs are. Islam is totally this as well.
You don't realize that the major and minor players, both "Jew" and non-Jew, are ordered to play their part and say certain things, even down to the local level. It's all coordinated and full of disinformation and deception. You don't know this? This is Conspiracy 101.
Your statements, "The fact that they claimed to be 'atheists' means nothing. Jews consider themselves a 'religion' and a 'nationality'. You can be a complete atheist and still be considered Jewish" are ridiculously obvious and superficial. Who doesn't know these? FYI, the higher level Ashkenazis don't care about either one, religion or nationality, because they're fronts.
94-96% of all Jews are Ashkenazis, and they're from Khazaria. Some say they came from ancient Persia, the so-called original "Aryan race." I say they're Khazarian, but either one is ok and close enough. The Rothschilds, which means "at the sign of the red shield" in German (Red Shield = satanic hexagram of Nimrod), spent big money to keep the true ancestry--the nationality--out of the public record. The Rothschilds were previously named "Bauer," and they have a long history of occultism.
The remaining small percentage are Mizrahi or Sephardic "Jews" from the Iberian Peninsula. They are Arabs converted to Judaism. Judaism is an exoteric control mechanism (a beLIEf), made up by the Babylon Brotherhood, who were the Essenes, Levites, Theraputae, and Hebrews (the priest class of Kemet). None of them were Jewish. Fake religion and fake ancestry. So, the modern "Jewish" people are double-tricked.
The nasty Ashkenazi leadership, who are part of the Cabal (that name came from "Kabbalah"), know who they are and know they have no legitimate claim to a homeland in the Levant. "Zionist/Zionism" is another tricky word whose meaning is not what it appears to be on the surface.
Essentially, all aspects of communism, including its planning and goals, are hidden, very complicated to the outsider (armchair theorist), and coordinated down to the last detail by ONE hierarchical organization. And for different reasons than you know. When you figure out the who and why, then it becomes simple.
Clock making was one of the skilled crafts practiced within the Jesuit Reductions in South America. The Guaraní people, under Jesuit guidance, demonstrated remarkable abilities in crafting complex instruments like clocks and astrolabes, similar to those made by Europeans[1]. This skill was part of a broader range of artisanal activities that included woodworking, carpentry, and metalwork, which were essential for the self-sufficiency of the missions[3]. The Jesuits encouraged these skills as part of their strategy to integrate indigenous people into European culture while maintaining their autonomy and economic viability[2][3].
Citations:
[1] The sky, as seen from the Missions : Revista Pesquisa Fapesp https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/en/the-sky-as-seen-from-the-missions/
[2] Jesuit missions among the Guaraní - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuit_missions_among_the_Guaran%C3%AD
[3] [PDF] Jesuit Reductions and Workshops in South America https://www.creighton.edu/sites/default/files/2022-01/23-Reductions.pdf
[4] Jesuit Missions of Chiquitos - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuit_Missions_of_Chiquitos
[5] Jesuit Mission of San Cosme y San Damián https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/6613/
[6] Centuries later, Jesuit missions in South America are still ... https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2018/12/11/centuries-later-jesuit-missions-south-america-are-still-strengthening
[7] The story of Jesuit missions in Paraguay in photos | Czick on the road https://www.czickontheroad.com/jesuit-missions-paraguay
[8] In South America, Missions of a Lost Utopia - The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/03/travel/03missions.html
Unkle Clif seems to think that the aliens he hung out with in hyperspace have communistic hierachy.
Makes sense looking at how they made us thier bitch, but much more importantly how they get us to do the f***** up things that we do to each other on a regular basis...
what ethnicity is Clif?
Clif High gives Naomi Wolf his opinion on her culture and the Elohim - 30:00
..”Individuals have been mind captured and are still doing their work..These aliens have wrapped themselves in the Jewish population to protect themselves…”
https://odysee.com/@Qwinten:b/New-Clif-High-+-Naomi-Wolf-on-Outspoken-Futurist-on-the-Meaning-of-Life:5
I somewhat agree. You're getting closer to the truth. Dig deeper.
The frequent blaming of Jews in many comments after this articles and others got me thinking. The current rise in the West of resentment towards "Jews" is interesting. Despite the Anti-Defamation League's (ADL) and Left socialists' push for non-judgmentalism and removing all hints of discrimination, and news of governments now prosecuting individuals for anti-Semitism, this resentment is building. Well, a lot of it is Right wing backlash. Look at how Trump is clumsily playing both sides of this issue.
So far, only conspiracists have voiced this, but I think it will spread to the rest of the population. The Elite seem to be encouraging this by making it obvious that Ashkenazi Jews, who are actually Khazarians, are taking over everything, as some truthers loudly point out (in these comments too). Many important top positions in institutions, media, education, corporations, and government have been taken over by Jews. The presidents of many countries are now Jewish. It's not so much out of control as out in the open now.
The irony is The Powers That Be (PTB) are using the conspiracist dupes, triggering their ignorant and misplaced hatred for the "Jews." This plays right into the PTB's plans. It’s not anti-Semitism because the Khazarians are not Semites. Isra-hell’s leadership is practicing extreme anti-Semitism on the true natives of the Levant.
It's glaringly obvious the Elite is shoving this down our collective throats. Their controlled media reports daily on Isra-hell's atrocities, treachery, and manipulation of governments. It's only a matter of time that the West will turn against Jews and Judaism. This will sound strange to most of you, but Khazarian leaders are welcoming it! What? Did I just say that? Would it surprise you to hear that Isra-hell is funding and supporting Hamas? Khazarian leadership has been hiding behind Jewish identity and Judaism for a long time. Now they’re preparing for a big public transition and later removal of the masks.
They hate those they rule and see them as the same as the rest of the world's goyem. All the world's Elite feel the same about their cattle. Did you know the Saudi royal family are Sabbatean-Frankists? That's an incredibly sinister form of Babylonian-Talmudic Satanism. "Talmudic" means the Talmud. By getting the “Jewish” people believing they’re “the chosen ones,” the PTB are manipulating them.
I know why hatred of Jews will be increasingly promoted in the West. Some famous alternative researchers have hinted at it. The Top Elite already know this, like the Ur-Lodge members, because it's their plan. The Brotherhood must eventually stir up hate for both the Arabs and Jews/Islam and Judaism, not just toward Arabs and Islam, as has been the case for decades. They must do this if they want the expected intra-Abrahamic War to go as planned.
The goal is the destruction of all three religions to make way for open, collective following of the One World Luciferian Religion (OWLR), which is an exoteric version of the esoteric Serpent Religion (SR). The top levels of the PTB already practice SR. This will go a long way, together with the One World Government and NWO Agenda, toward achieving worldwide serfdom. This will also move the Source Truth Harvest toward its conclusion, which is the real and ultimate purpose of all this accelerating trouble. The remaining portion of this year and the next will be quite a ride.
No, asshole!
The JEWS did!
August 31, 1897!
In Basel,Switzerland!
Wow, so arrogant in your ignorance.
Ah, and you are the Shit Kike who will tell me what to think!
Go fuck yourself, asshole!
I somewhat agree with Lloyd Miller's comment, "finding the inventor of communism is probably a fool's errand" if one gets caught up in all the intrigue as 009 and Dionysios Dionou do. It's intentionally constructed as an intricate puzzle.
You can simplify by learning the core hierarchical structure, overriding Agenda of the Illuminati/Cabal/Deep State/Hidden Hand/Atonists/Zionists (doesn't mean Jewish)/Babylon Brotherhood, and most importantly, the "why" behind it all. Unfortunately, none of you armchair theorizers are (not yet) awake and connected Source Players (SPs), and most of you aren't even SPs, so unraveling the mystery is impossible for you. The limitation is your status, not your intelligence.
This group has controlled the world for a long time and is stronger and more sophisticated in its methods today than it's ever been. Plus, the Matrix and entities are backing it up (controlling it). It has long been a complex web of mass mind control and "perception deception," with "the spider in the middle" of it, as David Icke tells it.
Here's a less esoteric and more concrete answer. Going approximately from low to high in power, it was French, English, and Italian Freemasonry, the Bavarian Illuminati, the Jesuits (I'm not sure which of these two middle ones is more powerful), and the Black Venetians/Black Nobility that invented communism, primarily for Russia and China. All the groups and subgroups are interrelated. The subordinate organizations are well known, like the UN, Club of Rome, Bilderberg, Council of 300, Round Table, and CFR.
Communism was created for greater control of large areas of the world (the same reason Islam was created by the Vatican), to create negative energy from conflict (generate loosh), and to pave the way for the future NWO. These are some of the major reasons. Communism is a cover for other purposes and a control mechanism, like beLIEfs are.
The Talmudic (Babylon) Kabbalists and "I Neri" have infiltrated each other and the other groups like the Illuminati centers of London (including the Crown, aka "the Dragon Court"), Rome (the "Vattis-Can," aka "prophecy of the snake"), Paris, Madrid, Switzerland, and Germany. About 94-96% of Jews are known as Ashkenazi, but they are really Khazarian. Some theorize that they and the Black Nobility (Neri) are actually Persian in origin. Okay, close enough.
The remaining small percentage are Mizrahi or Sephardic "Jews" from the Iberian Peninsula. They're converted Arabs. Judaism is one of the faked-up religions of the Babylon Brotherhood. It was created for a reason by the Essenes, Levites, Therapeutae, and "Hebrews" (Kemet High Priests). Bottom line, there never were any "Jewish" people, and these largely Eastern Europeans-Western Asiatics have no claim to a "homeland" in the Middle East. They're not Semites.
Sorry for the conspiracy history lesson and going off on a tangent. It's fun to write about these subjects. My second book (Part II), "New World Order, Plandemic, and Cabal," is full of them. I can give some good references to anyone interested.
The issue of communism is complicated, yet simple, if you know the "why." The who, what, when, where, and how are interesting, once you put most of the pieces of the puzzle together.
American, i belive.
What is the significance?
Until we deal with usury or the debt based Ponzi scheme that is the money system, we will forever be playing a game of musical chairs as Charles Eisenstein put it.
Richard Werner’s credit creation theory proves that money is created by the banks out of nothing. This nothing has to always be paid back. The Central Bankers (a.k.a. the Banksters) always set the interest rates below the rate of inflation so money continuously decays in value.
The way out is the decentralised, verifiable, finite supply of Bitcoin.
While I agree with the first part of your first sentence, there is no "we." You could say the sheeple masses have been and will "be playing a game of musical chairs," but it's much worse for them than that.
I have two other disagreements. First, it doesn't have to be paid back. From this year on, the world will descend into designed chaos (ordo ab chao) and be turned completely upside down. We're entering very dark times, and all previous conventions and rules that you appear to depend on will be gone.
The Elite don’t allow anything to operate outside of their centralized control. Anything appearing “decentralized” is just for show, and their underlings are the only ones who “verify” it. Bitcoin is their creation, and it’s used as a Trojan horse for digital currency, which is an increased and AI-assisted form of control. You’ll see the roll-out of the social credit system after digital currency introduction. Wake up.
There's no "way out" that you can prognosticate about or imagine. There are no solutions for the masses. They are mostly illusionary stage props anyway.
I don’t trust bitcoin and think it’s a trojan horse for digital currency, which is evil and an important step in the NWO Agenda. I know a couple who lost $800K on it. I don't mean to sound critical, but I’m surprised many people like Iain McCausland can’t see this. Digital currency, its associated social credit system, and the entire NWO will be forced on the world anyway. Nothing can remedy this except for what an advanced Source Player can personally do.
Blimey! You sound like one of the Dark Overlords with the finger pointing at the ‘sheeple masses’ and ‘them.’ It appears from your writing that you feel immune from playing the money game of musical chairs. How so? I am intrigued.
"Blimey!" Haha, I'm immune to more than that. Have you ever heard of simulation hypothesis? I go beyond that. This illusionary Matrix Game was built by us Source Players (SPs) for only us to experience and be challenged in. Source Truth is a logical and practical, not a mystical, dogmatic, or esoteric practice. It's not the New Age. I am overlord over no one and am for positive advancement, not "dark."
I'm not a conspiracist, but I know what they know, feel a kinship to them, and will defend them. I have friends who are conspiracists. They'll never find a solution and they're subconsciously addicted to the fear.
‘The truth is that the choice is about who you serve, not how much money you have.’ Indeed. It all comes down to God or mammon. But the fact is we need money to eat. And that money is usurious.
The last part of your comment is correct. But I serve neither "God," nor mammon, so it doesn't "all come down to" that.
The Jesuit Reductions in South America have often been described as a form of "primitive communism" due to their communal structure and collective economic practices. These settlements, established by Jesuit missionaries in the 17th and 18th centuries, aimed to evangelize and protect indigenous populations like the Guaraní while fostering self-sufficient communities.
Key aspects supporting this characterization include:
- **Communal Land Ownership**: The reductions operated on a system where land (referred to as *tupambae*) was owned collectively by the community. The produce from this land was shared equitably among all members[2].
- **Collective Labor**: All inhabitants worked together on communal projects, such as farming and crafting, with the fruits of their labor distributed fairly[2].
- **Social Services**: The reductions provided free public services, including schools, hospitals, and support for the poor. They also implemented progressive policies like birth control and abolished the death penalty[2].
- **Economic Self-Sufficiency**: The reductions were highly organized and economically successful, producing goods like yerba mate and cowhides for trade. This success was achieved through cooperative efforts rather than individual profit motives[1][2].
While these features resemble elements of socialism or communism, the reductions were deeply rooted in Christian theology and Jesuit leadership. Critics argue that the rigid control exercised by the Jesuits limited indigenous autonomy, making the system more paternalistic than truly egalitarian[1].
Citations:
[1] Jesuit missions among the Guaraní - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuit_Reductions
[2] The Jesuit Missions in South America: Jesuits Reductions in Paraguay, Argentina, Brazil - Colonial Voyage https://www.colonialvoyage.com/jesuit-missions-south-america/
[3] Transformed Worlds https://revista.drclas.harvard.edu/transformed-worlds/
[4] Reductions - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuit_reduction
[5] Suppression of the Society of Jesus - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suppression_of_the_Society_of_Jesus
[6] https://www.creighton.edu/sites/default/files/2022-01/23-Reductions.pdf
[7] Jesuits and Communism: Introduction https://brill.com/view/journals/jjs/5/1/article-p1_1.xml?language=en
[8] Jesuits in Spanish America before the Suppression https://brill.com/display/book/9789004460348/BP000006.xml?language=en
Haha, you or your quoted material (but it's you quoting it), make the Jesuits out to be saintly. You don't know who they are? "Limited indigenous autonomy," indeed.
financing regenticide
There is no evidence from the provided search results that the Jesuit Reductions in South America were involved in financing regicide. The Jesuits focused on establishing autonomous communities to protect indigenous peoples from enslavement and colonial exploitation, while promoting Christianity and economic self-sufficiency. Their activities were centered around evangelization, education, and economic development within the missions, not political intrigue or violence like regicide. The Jesuits' expulsion in 1767 was due to broader European political pressures rather than any involvement in such activities.
Citations:
[1] Jesuit missions among the Guaraní - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuit_missions_among_the_Guaran%C3%AD
[2] The Jesuits and Native Communities - myUSF https://myusf.usfca.edu/provost/The-Jesuits-and-Native-Communities
[3] Transformed Worlds - ReVista | - Harvard University https://revista.drclas.harvard.edu/transformed-worlds/
[4] Demographic patterns of sedentary and non-sedentary populations https://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1851-37512017000200004&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=en
[5] [PDF] Jesuits in the New World: A Contrast in Conversion of North and ... https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1181&context=aujh
[6] [PDF] The Demographic Collapse of Native Peoples of the Americas, 1492 ... https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/4002/81p247.pdf
[7] The Guenoa Minuanos and the Jesuit Missions among the Guaraní http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2027-46882021000100280
[8] Frontier Missions in South America: Impositions, Adaptations, and ... https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/28099/chapter/212210398
You really don't know who the Jesuits are, and you fall for the conditioning. Or you're publically acting like you don't know and providing cover. Either way, good job.