The Ghost of Henry Kissinger Still Haunts the Chinese Dream
“Well, you can just stop and think of what could happen if anybody with a decent system of government got control of that mainland. Good God … there’d be no power in the world that could even—I mean, you put 800 million Chinese to work under a decent system … and they will be the leaders of the world.”
― Henry Kissinger, quoting Richard Nixon in “On China”
SOME BACKGROUND INFO
It became apparent during the lockdowns of 2020, when researchers started digging up proof of a coordinated assault on humanity, that China was knee-deep in the muck with the globalists.
Very few commentators saw it coming, but in hindsight, the Rockefeller Foundation produced a document called Scenario For The Future of Technology And International Development in 2010, that presented a “scenario” titled Operation Lockstep (page 18) that described the COVID plandemic far too accurately for it to be mere coincidence.
The scenario narrated a hypothetical event: A virus emerges from China and rapidly spreads around the world, destroying the economies of the West. Luckily, China’s economy was miraculously saved because of the country’s “quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders.”
A few short months before the nefarious coronavirus appeared in the media, a dress rehearsal for the planned Covid-19 operation, Event 201, was conducted on October 18, 2019 in New York City. The exercise simulated a severe pandemic caused by a novel zoonotic coronavirus, transmitted from bats to pigs to people, and eventually becoming transmissible from person to person. George Fu Gao, the Director-General of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, participated in this simulation exercise. Gao is a Chinese/WEF agent who was recruited by Wellcome Trust, a GlaxoSmithKline pharmaceutical foundation.
The event was hosted by the usual suspects: The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum, and the omnipresent Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
At Event 201, Gao specifically raised the point of countering “misinformation” during a “hypothetical” coronavirus pandemic—that some people might believe that the virus was man-made and propagated by a pharmaceutical company. Imagine that.
THE BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE
The Belt and Road Initiative is a key component of the WEF plans for the rapid urbanization of the entire planet. Connecting the Eurasian landmass with rail, roads and a digital grid is key to their master plan of creating 15-minute cities that will act as the regional hubs of a grand technocratic police state that spans the entire globe.
More on Artificial Intelligence and the WEF’s plans:
These new Belt and Road Cities will be a distinctive new urban form, that includes high-tech surveillance, digital ID tied to digital currency, which in turn will be tied to the individual’s social credit score. China’s state capitalism managed by a singular political oligarchy dovetails neatly with the WEF’s Stakeholder Capitalism economic policy.
So far, over 200 BRI cooperation agreements have been signed with more than 150 countries and 30 international organizations.
The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace review of The Belt and Road City, written by Simon Curtis, senior fellow at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, and a World Economic Forum’s advisory board member, Ian Klaus. He is also a US State Dept Senior Adviser:
“The Belt and Road Initiative, which seeks to revitalize and reconnect the ancient Silk Roads that linked much of the world before the rise of the West, is an attempt to place China at the center of this new international order, one shaped by Chinese power, norms, and values. It seeks to do so, in part, by shaping our shared urban future.”
Klaus Schwab of the WEF can’t stop praising the Belt and Road Initiative: From his speech in 2017 at the Belt and Road Forum: “That is why I am so enthusiastic about the One Belt One Road Initiative. It takes a long-term and holistic view, and makes a unique contribution to international cooperation and economic development in five important and innovative ways.”
Schwab then outlines 5 reasons why we should all sign up for more socialism with Chinese characteristics:
1. This One Belt One Road Initiative is based on the stakeholder approach.
2. This initiative seeks to leverage market forces in the best ways.
3. This initiative prepares best for the age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
4. This initiative is built on the open platform concept.
5. This initiative is the positive narrative the world needs.
Schwab takes a poke at conspiracy theorists too: “Traditional frameworks of regional peace and cooperation are being torn apart by nationalist forces who blame various externalities, such as “refugees”, “terrorists” or even “the global elite” for their citizens’ feelings of being ignored, left out or left behind.”
In other words, the political dissident community (that’s you and me) are wrecking all their plans. Can I get an amen brothers and sisters?
The United Nations loves the Chinese plan for world dominance too, claiming it can make important contributions to the 2030 Agenda:
“2030 Agenda is an unprecedentedly ambitious, universal, and overarching action plan, which has charted a sustainable development path for the world in the next 15 years and beyond … In this regard, the “Belt and Road,” as a large-scaled regional development cooperation, can make important contributions to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda.”
More than 25 United Nations agencies are directly involved in the Belt and Road Initiative, including the IMF, the World Bank Group and UNICEF.
There can be no doubt that a world dominated by the Chinese model of government is far different from the Western model of democracy, civil rights and freedoms. Political opposition is illegal in China, Freedom of speech and freedom of assembly are severely restricted by the government. Censorship is widespread and dissent is harshly punished in the country. Just one example: Entrepreneur Ren Zhiqiang wrote an essay criticizing President Xi Jinping: “I saw not an emperor standing there exhibiting his new clothes, but a clown who stripped naked and insisted on continuing being emperor.”
Ren was sentenced to 18 years in prison in September, 2020.
China's all-seeing surveillance grid now has more than 700 million CCTV cameras (half of the world total), and it is conducting real-time spying on all of its 1.4 billion citizens, giving each of them a personal social credit score, based on how they behave.
IT’S ALL KISSINGER’S FAULT
Henry Kissinger, the former CEO of the New World Order slithered out of his pit and snuck over to China in 1971 for secret talks with Mao Tse Tung and Chou En-Lai.
Recently released classified US government memos reveal that Kissinger attempted as early as 1970 to open up channels of communication with the Chinese government through an intermediary, Pakistan President Yahya Khan.
The Nixon administration wanted to forge an alliance with China to act as a counterweight to the Soviet Union. The Chinese government insisted that US troops needed to be withdrawn from Taiwan, or else no deal. This resulted in Taiwan being expelled from the United Nations in October 1971, and China being recognized as, “the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations.”
This was seen by such anti-communist commentators, like William F. Buckley, as a “staggering capitulation” and a betrayal of America’s ally Taiwan.
For their own part, after the death of Mao Tse Tung in 1976, the Chinese government abandoned Maoism. His successor, Deng Xiaoping abolished the communes, instituted many economic reforms and organized four Special Economic Zones to encourage foreign investment.
“Socialism with Chinese characteristics” became the new national ideology. If memory serves me correctly, socialism combined with nationalism equals National Socialism or NAZISM. Fascism is the merger of corporation and state, and there can be very little resistance to the idea that the Chinese state and Chinese corporations are joined at the hip.
China, under President Deng, abandoned international socialism, and embraced state capitalism (with socialist characteristics).
Why were Henry Kissinger and by extension, his overlords, the globalist architects so hot and heavy to get in bed with communist China?
The answer is location, location, location.
China’s central location on the Eurasian continent, combined with its access to the Pacific Ocean and the South China Sea made it the ideal choice for its new role as transportation hub and world’s factory. The Belt and Road Initiative is the further extension of the Chinese Dream of restoring its national honour and reviving its mandate from heaven (with globalist characteristics).
China was attractive to Dr. K and the globalists because it had a willing slave-labour workforce of a billion peasants, who were only too happy to leave the rice paddies of rural poverty, and go to work in the factories and sweat shops in the cities along the eastern seaboard. The grandparents and parents of today’s generation of young affluent urban Chinese men and women sacrificed much, working 12 hour days, six days a week so their offspring could get a better education and therefore, a better life.
The other logical choices, assuming Kissinger and the global architects spent some time mulling over a map, would be India, Pakistan or Iran, all three with access to seaports and large populations of cheap labour. However, Kissinger and Nixon found receptive and willing partners when they sat down to tea with Mao Tse Tung and Chou En-lai in Beijing in 1971—and started a partnership with the globalists that continues to this day.
It should be noted, that the World Economic Forum had its first meeting January 26-31, 1971, just six months before Kissinger had his first meeting with Mao.
From Kissinger’s perspective, from his book On China, that “The Sino-U.S. rapprochement started as a tactical aspect of the Cold War; it evolved to where it became central to the evolution of the new global order.”
THE CHINESE CAPITALIST PARTY
There are now only 4 nations that officially identify as communism: China, Cuba, Laos and Vietnam. The largest of these is China, arguably the most capitalist nation on Earth, currently trading with 234 nations and territories. In other words, the whole f@#king planet.
Karl Marx is rolling over in his grave.
Kissinger quotes a book that was a best-seller in China, China Dreams: Great Power Thinking and Strategic Posture in the Post-American Era:
PLA Senior Colonel Liu Mingfu’s 2010 China Dream defines a national “grand goal”: to “become number one in the world,” restoring China to a modern version of its historic glory. This, he writes, will require displacing the United States.
Kissinger claims that,
“China’s rise, Liu prophesies, will usher in a golden age of Asian prosperity in which Chinese products, culture, and values set the standard for the world. The world will be harmonious because China’s leadership will be wiser and more temperate than America’s, and because China will eschew hegemony and limit its role to acting as primus inter pares [first among equals] of the nations of the world. (In a separate passage, Liu comments favourably on the role of traditional Chinese Emperors, whom he describes as acting as a kind of benevolent “elder brother” to smaller and weaker countries’ kings.)”
I cannot imagine Americans accepting China as their benevolent elder brother at any time in the near or distant future. American nationalism is absolute—in the eyes of many Americans, there is no other nation worthy of mention. America is everything, everything is America.
The hardcore nationalists on both side of the political fence will never accept second-tier status to any nation. Yet, it is the bitter pill they are swallowing every day, watching America decline. The moral and mental decay in American cities is a real and palatable thing, like a dank smell in the air.
China is moving fast, building new projects, bridges, tunnels, high-speed rail, parks and a proliferation of start-ups and innovative new technology, while the indispensable nation is preoccupied with supplying weapons to Israel so it can pulverise Palestinians into dust, and engaging in elections that are ever more ridiculous and asinine. The American voting public is forced to choose between a loud, boorish clown and a cackling, vacuous airhead.
How could a China-centric world be any worse than the last 70 years of American wars, interventions, CIA-coups, invasions and psychological operations? Might the world be a better place if a more competent management team took over the reins of policing the rules-based order?
In the alternative community, the 5D Chess crowd are gleeful at the prospect of watching the Western hegemon squirm as China rises higher and higher. The disenfranchised Global South, long the victim of American bullying are infused with the idea of coming out from under the imperialist Western boot and making the bugger’s eyes water.
The multipolar world, however is only an emerging idea, not a visible reality. Some may have concluded that we are only trading one hegemon for another. Here comes the new multipolar boss, same as the old unipolar boss?
This however, does not seem accurate. The Chinese culture, civilisation and political model are not the same as the American order. The Chinese have a different way of doing things, with a different language, traditions and values. With over 5000 years of history, China has weathered all kinds of political, societal and financial turmoil. The Chinese people are generally conservative, diligent and family oriented. On the negative side, history has shown their submissive culture is inclined to authoritarian governments with a collective mindset.
On the other side of the ideological fence, Western values have devolved into a surreal gender ideology promoted by shallow Hollywood celebrities and narcissistic pop stars.
Which is worse? A declining, emotionally ill society descending into madness, or an ascending totalitarian regime that offers financial security combined with 24/7 surveillance?
Neither of these choices gives me the warm fuzzies.
This week, while 36 national leaders meet in Kazan, Russia to decide the fate of the world, it occurred to me that maybe there is a glimmer of hope in this colourful collection of tribes, meeting and mingling in the autumn sun of the Russian Steppes. It might just be better in the long term for our fractured world to have a greater diversity of culture and civilisation represented on the world stage.
Or maybe it’s just wishful thinking, a fleeting hope, a flickering flame soon blown out.
Only time will tell.
For my previous article on the Kazan Summit:
Loved it!
Better the devil you know. The 1 child policy has screwed several generations and fortunately with the want for males will lead to a huge demographic collapse and India taking the crown.