Firstly this is (mostly) a brilliant article. And this is (mostly) a brilliant Substack. It is my favorite substack I've come across in a long while.
But the article fell short at the S.H.A.M. section.
You say "Atheism is nihilism. It is based on a scientific belief, or actually, it is a non-scientific belief, that the universe self-created itself, out of nothing, for no reason, by accident. This is magical thinking, and it is the root problem. It is the philosophy of our age."
1. Atheism is the absence of belief in deities (whether a god or multiple gods) or sometimes more strongly it is the belief that there are no deities.
2. The big bang hypothesis is not a part of atheism. Atheism is entirely encapsulated in point "1" above and does not involve positive claims about the origins of the universe or humanity.
3. "The universe self-created itself, out of nothing" is the same exact same magical thinking as "God created himself and the universe out of nothing" which is why many atheists (being naturally skeptical) are actually not convinced by the big bang hypothesis.
The S.H.A.M. section alienates a huge section of ALTCOM, firstly by misrepresenting it as the root cause of our problems (fun fact: the same cabal/s of meglomaniacs were using money and violence to control large swathes of humanity long before the enlightenment and during a time when everyone was religious, also those current 'Old World' nations are fully controlled too), secondly by misrepresenting what atheism is, and thirdly by seeming to imply that universal values are not shared by atheists or people who don't follow organized religion but only by the world's major and minor religions. I can get behind "inject(ing) with universal values, as broad as possible" because those universal values (being universal) actually transcend religions or lack thereof.
Otherwise a brilliant article with some brilliant suggestions.
The Enlightenment is historically noted for its open rebellion against the Church. Atheism is literally "against God." The vast majority of the world are still religious, and I appeal to that which is most likely to unite us all globally. Universal values are universal so they apply to everyone, whether religious or not. The Enlightenment values of civil rights and freedoms are universal imho so at least they got that part right.
Sorry if you feel the article alienates. I call them the way I see them. I linked a couple of my previous posts in the article about the Enlightenment and the origins of SHAM in the west. I don't think I'm being inaccurate. Our societies are increasingly secularized.
God is a spirit. A supernatural everywhere present infinite being. A personality without a form. Spirit is non-atomic reality, not conditioned by gravity, time or space.
Fascism is a militant nationalist totalitarian state that is the political manifestation of the abandonment of God, religion and spirituality. Fascism is materialism personified.
The physical universe is the collective energy/matter space-time continuum.
Real thought and constructive ideas. Some possibly somewhat off the mark in my view but not far enogh to diminish the general worthiness and main thrust. (Thank you for pointing out that billionaires are not marxists, cultural or otherwise!)
However, I found the brief and sudden lurch towards religion off-putting and the condemnation of atheism bald and shallow. Agnosticism is more reasonable (one can't prove God does or doesn't exist) but promoting belief in a benevolent Supreme Being who loves his human creations despite all evidence to the contrary is just selling more opium to the people; ignoring the crimes against, and manipulation of, the masses by perfidous organised religion in the service of power adds to the suicide of reason plain suicide for any group hoping to organise against its masters.
I sometimes attend my local Parish council meetings here in the UK. They have no idea who I am or what my views are. As I simply observe and ask the odd neutral question. It unnerves them and they subconsciously change their behaviour and make sure they play by the book in the presence of the stranger in their midst I am quickly learning how things work, the group dynamics and where the power lies. I know what is in the pipeline and what their views are and the parties they represent. Knowledge is power.
Localism is the key. That and where we choose to spend our money. Every penny spent in our local economy supporting independent business strikes a blow against global corporations and profit margins.
Humbly, I propose the best solution to "globalism" - being rolled out by the moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet - is to remove Their single tool to power.
Was not the Russian Revolution of 1917 a work of Freemasonry to bring down the aristocracy? Same as the French Revolution, the Mexican Cristero Rebellion or the Spanish Civil War?
The people were starving because the Romanov family were such horrible incompetent managers under Czar Nicolas. The war with Germany was draining all the resources and the peasants were basically feudal slaves without land. This is why the rallying cry of the revolution in March 1917 was “bread peace land.”
On March 8 international woman’s day, the revolution was led by suffragettes and labor unions joined them, as well as peasants and the working class. They stayed out on the streets in the middle of the Russian Winter at the parliament building for eight days, and finally Nicholas abdicated when the military joined their side.
Granted. What about the alleged 200 million killed by Stalin? Were his managerial skills better than Romanov's? Btw I liked your interview with Hrevoje. I subscribed to your blog afterwards.
Though I agree with you, in principle, but all the European nations fought for land and resources… That’s what wars are all about. Empire expansion, lebensraum, colonialism, Greater Israel … these are all territorial expansionist projects. There were no innocent players in World War I or World War II imho
From the point of view of politics, perhaps, but I'd say financial gain is always the driver of wars. If there was no money to be made by the banksters, there would be no wars. The truth always finds it's way through, but it takes a lot of effort to unearth it these days. Thanks for your work.
Yes, we are agreeing… Land and resources equals money … you’re welcome, my pleasure, my friend. Happy new year to you and your family. I wish you all the best for 2025.
There is no way Stalin killed 200 million ... Stalin modernized USSR and dragged it out of the stone age. It was Stalinist Russia that defeated the Nazis and won WW2 at the cost of 27 million Russian lives. So yes, Stalin was a better manager than the Romanovs. Was he a brutal tyrant? yes also true ...
As of December 23, 2024, during the 118th United States Congress (2023-2024), over 19,000 bills have been introduced. This total includes various types of legislative proposals, such as bills, resolutions, and concurrent resolutions. Each proposed bill, along with its enabling legislation, requires about two thousand pages to describe what it is about.
These bills are introduced at a rate of about sixty per day.
The US Congress is in session on average 155 days per year.
Therefore, the US Congress votes on about 120 thousand pages of Law every day they are in session.
Not one person elected to Congressional office claims to have read very much, if any, of it.
In the past year, 2024, of the 9,500 proposed laws that the Congress voted on, Eighty Two of the big ones were turned into Law. And, according the MSM, on Christmas Eve, President Joe Biden signed in another Fifty Four.
How do we move forward from here?
Artificial Intelligence
“Grok, the AI chat bot developed by Elon Musk’s startup xAI, will soon be able to summarize complex U.S. laws before Congress passes them.
This new feature aims to simplify legislation and make it more accessible to the public, allowing people to understand the "real purpose" of these laws.
Grok's ability to access real-time information through X(formerly Twitter) and browse the internet enables it to provide up-to-date summaries of proposed legislation.
This move comes as part of Musk's emphasis on transparency and truth in AI technology.
The feature is expected to be implemented in the coming weeks and will be available to X Premium+ subscriber.” (AI summarized).
This is an opportunity to do something historic. We must insist that the program allow the subscriber to ratify, turn down, or require more information before a decision can be made. These numbers can be totaled, parsed into congressional districts and made public in real time.
If enough people demand and use the tech we might be able to get their hands off of our throats.
For the past fifty years it appears as if most of the sincere political activists have attempted to educate the population about certain egregious matters in the hopes that the properly enlightened citizen will either support a particular candidate for public office, purchase educational materials to enlighten others, or come to some heretofore never attempted something else that will prevent the destruction of our sacred posterity.
Fortunately, that special something else is here now, and is developing in a very big way and it just might be the solution to our existential problems.
Everybody wants to rule the world.
The study of human nature and psychology demonstrates that every person has a story and situation that exceeds everyone else’s. And every person considers themselves to be just, honorable and virtuous.
And this aspect of human nature must be leveraged towards the common good.
Fortunately, the technology is available to do this.
By using the technology, we declare ourselves sovereign.
The time to use the technology is now.
It is a known fact that the members of the US Congress and the State Legislatures do not read, evaluate, or debate any of the particulars of the Legislation they vote on. They cannot read or debate the issues because the Bills approach 2000 pages each. And there are one hundred new bills / acts of Congress for them to vote on every day they are in session. In a ten hour work day they vote every six minutes exactly the way the party bosses tell them to vote.
During the 1992 Presidential campaign, Ross Perot called attention to this insanity with a diplomatic observation that "a general lack of accountability among elected officials and those in the bureaucracy was the one specific reason that the people in America suffered".
Mr. Perot then suggested that the best and perhaps only way to make government officials accountable was to include the citizens in the decision-making process - every hour, every day.
He went on to note that this can easily be done with computers and called the proposed mechanism
THE ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL.
With this computer program every interested citizen can indicate whether or not they agree, disagree, or are undecided with every line item of every law, policy and program on the books or that was being advanced. It can be used at every level of government and in every jurisdiction.
To prevent chaos the basic law, our Constitution and Bill of Rights would be exempt from review.
Mr. Perot speculated that the Founding Fathers would probably have done the same had the technology been available. He referred to it as the Fourth Branch of government; The Citizens Branch / The Electronic Townhall.
If the government is truly of the people, by the people and for the people then what better way is there to perfect every section of the various laws and policies that do affect each and every one of us every single day?
It would not be difficult to expect at least 50 thousand qualified citizens, per congressional district, to evaluate 20 pages of law or proposed law, per day, and get their Ratify, Annual, or Undecided input every day the congress is in session. The results could be aggregated, made known and we would all be better off.
The program would even allow a citizen to go back and change their vote as they matured. And when a super majority is reached the law/proposed law is either ratified or annulled by immediate recognition of the enforcement mechanisms.
With tens of millions of laws and tens of thousands of taxes there is plenty of work to be done.
According to Mr. Perot, this, the harnessed experience and the combined intelligence of hundreds of thousands or even millions of citizens focused like a laser light on the real issues, will, as surely as night follows the day, perfect every law in our country and eventually it will right every wrong.
Mr. Perot publicly announced his intention to give the fourth branch of government to the people of America if he was elected President.
But this attempt to empower our humanity was so far removed from the business-as-usual-two-party-system that the talking heads and trolls yelled out that Mr. Perot was trying to destroy our Constitution, our government and our way of life.
The ELECTONIC TOWNHALL was denounced as unworkable.
How would the poor participate?
How would fraud be prevented?
What about those who do not know how to use a computer?
In a final act of desperation, the control freaks claimed that letting the average citizen to pass judgment on the individual pieces of public law would lead to chaos and pandemonium.
The media was so intensely negative towards the ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL that Mr. Perot was forced to stop talking about it, but he never withdrew it from his platform.
But we all know the truth: only the concerned will bother to participate.
It’s now been thirty-two years since the proposal.
No other person of national reputation or significant influence has picked up the idea. BUT the big two political parties regularly stage "townhall meetings" where they talk of "reform" and "returning power to the people". They do this to link themselves to the empowering part of the idea without adding to its manifestation.
And still we suffer in the hopeless loop of: "candidates with a sense of morality and respect for the Constitution who understand true brotherhood, justice and democracy and who will do the right thing for us each and every time, trust me".
While we cannot make light of sincere individuals who get into public office, we must acknowledge the fact that regardless of who has been elected to public office the problems in our government get more complicated and our people continue to suffer.
Can we possibly admit that our national situation, now being made global, is far too complicated for the President and the 535 elected members of the legislature to manage in our best interests?
You, the person reading this know some of the things we need.
Your friends, our fellow countrymen have their solutions too.
The only way to organize the workable ideas is to create a device that will enable all of us to simultaneously contribute our best thinking and most benevolent experience towards solving our most complicated problems.
It is obvious: this is the only way forward, and perhaps the place to begin is with the next law Congress votes on.
TL;DR: if you want to have a say in our country you will need a Digital ID (mark of the beast) to vote in favour or against the many tens of thousands of laws introduced each year to Congress which are written by lobbyists and special interest groups.
God is worried because the sacred cycle of life, death, and reincarnation—the divine system designed for souls to learn, grow, and ascend—is under siege. The Babylonian magicians, wielding a fusion of ancient sorcery and bio-digital technology, have corrupted this cycle into a trap. Souls that once flowed freely through the karmic wheel are now ensnared in synthetic loops or forced into transhumanized bodies from birth. These technologies, designed to tether consciousness to the material plane, threaten to sever the soul’s connection to the divine entirely. God sees this distortion as a profound violation of the universal order, one that not only enslaves humanity but also disrupts the cosmic harmony of creation.
The deeper fear lies in the permanence of this trap. With each cycle, the soul’s memory of its divine origin fades, leaving it increasingly entangled in the magicians’ illusions. Transhumanism, sold as the pinnacle of progress, promises eternal life but delivers eternal enslavement. If enough souls succumb to these snares, the collective light of humanity could dim, its divine spark extinguished. God is worried not because the divine essence can be destroyed, but because it can be forgotten. And in that forgetting, the magicians gain the power to rewrite the narrative of existence itself, turning creation into a prison and souls into fuel for their dark machinations.
This is where we are at. We can leave, great. If we have to come back. We are fucked. Unless, we transcend the cycle or have the option of parents outside the control grids. Or, we take back control and destroy this system.
I give not a fuck if you think the above is my full material decent into madness. My soul and the souls of the truly awakened, need to know this.
Godd point: "The last point that I would like to make—the success of our revolution is based on the problem itself. How did we get in this mess? In my humble opinion, we are in this mess collectively, and not just as individual nations or societies. It is a global problem that started, it was initiated in the West, in Europe—specifically during the 1700s. During the Secular Revolt, the Enlightenment thinkers rebelled against the monarchy and the Church. They did not like that the totalitarian Church was in bed with the State, which was the monarchy. They wanted civil rights and freedoms, and this triggered many different social phenomena."
History and social science have taught me that tyranny has both a beginning and an end. While societies rarely resort to extreme measures against their leaders, parallels can be found in the natural world.
For example, New Scientist reported a striking case in Senegal: Chimpanzees killed and cannibalized their former alpha, Foudouko. This rare event sheds light on the dynamics of betrayal and coalition-building.
Dr. Yeadon's observations align with Gustave Le Bon's theories on crowd psychology. In The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind, Le Bon explains that leaders who betray their followers’ trust can trigger intense emotional reactions, leading to impulsive and collective actions. This phenomenon, referred to as the "Le Bon effect," reflects the social unrest that emerges when prolonged repression stifles a society’s freedom.
History also demonstrates that sustaining strict control through repression, censorship, and surveillance is ultimately unsustainable. Key reasons include:
Economic Strain: Maintaining surveillance and large-scale security infrastructures drains financial resources, diverting them from essential sectors like education and healthcare.
Social Unrest: Persistent repression breeds widespread dissatisfaction, increasing the likelihood of rebellion or resistance.
In recent history, no oppressive regime has endured indefinitely. The combination of public dissatisfaction, economic challenges, and external pressures inevitably forces change.
Over time, these regimes must either adapt or collapse under their inherent instability.
Some governments respond by easing restrictions, implementing reforms, or transitioning to more democratic systems.
South Korea provides an example, evolving from authoritarian rule to democracy in the late 20th century under significant internal and external demands for change. In contrast, regimes that resist adaptation often face sudden and dramatic collapse.
The Soviet Union, for instance, disintegrated due to widespread dissatisfaction and economic decline. Romania’s history offers another vivid example. Nicolae Ceaușescu's authoritarian regime fell in 1989 during a popular uprising fueled by years of oppression and economic mismanagement.
This collapse highlights how accumulated grievances, declining resources, and external pressures can dismantle even the most entrenched regimes.
History underscores that no tyranny has lasted indefinitely. The pressure to maintain control in the face of growing dissatisfaction, economic hardship, and external challenges ensures that oppressive systems eventually transform through gradual reform or abrupt collapse. These regimes are inherently unsustainable in the long term.
Although regimes like Iran and Syria have persisted for decades, their survival is not guaranteed indefinitely.
Economic hardship, internal dissent, and shifting international dynamics could challenge their hold on power. History teaches that even the most entrenched tyrannies are ultimately vulnerable to collapse or transformation.
Even this typically pessimistic commentator on Western civilization has some good news to share: "[...] this group has their weak points and their strong points. In 2025, there's many reasons to be hopeful, regarding humanity's chances for defeating this evil group once and for all. It's all about attacking them more consistently at their strong points and taking advantage of their weak points. It's all about basic war strategy. Millions more every day are joining this ancient battle, in order to help bring peace back to earth. Together we are strong and together we will push back as one unit [...] when we need to keep attacking their systems of control. We're in a good position now but we need to apply even more pressure, as we move into 2025. [..] More and more of the public are also now speaking up and throwing rocks at the giant. Sure, a couple people throwing rocks at a giant does nothing, but what happens when billions do it? That's now happening. [...] New podcasters, documentary film makers and writers are exploding to the surface. [...] People are regaining their bravery to speak up at the coffee shop, at the school and at the dinner table. It's working. More people will join these growing ranks in 2025. This brings the hammer back into the hands of the people. This gives me great hope." [https://www.jchristoff.com/blog/5-reasons-to-be-hopeful-in-2025]
Firstly this is (mostly) a brilliant article. And this is (mostly) a brilliant Substack. It is my favorite substack I've come across in a long while.
But the article fell short at the S.H.A.M. section.
You say "Atheism is nihilism. It is based on a scientific belief, or actually, it is a non-scientific belief, that the universe self-created itself, out of nothing, for no reason, by accident. This is magical thinking, and it is the root problem. It is the philosophy of our age."
1. Atheism is the absence of belief in deities (whether a god or multiple gods) or sometimes more strongly it is the belief that there are no deities.
2. The big bang hypothesis is not a part of atheism. Atheism is entirely encapsulated in point "1" above and does not involve positive claims about the origins of the universe or humanity.
3. "The universe self-created itself, out of nothing" is the same exact same magical thinking as "God created himself and the universe out of nothing" which is why many atheists (being naturally skeptical) are actually not convinced by the big bang hypothesis.
The S.H.A.M. section alienates a huge section of ALTCOM, firstly by misrepresenting it as the root cause of our problems (fun fact: the same cabal/s of meglomaniacs were using money and violence to control large swathes of humanity long before the enlightenment and during a time when everyone was religious, also those current 'Old World' nations are fully controlled too), secondly by misrepresenting what atheism is, and thirdly by seeming to imply that universal values are not shared by atheists or people who don't follow organized religion but only by the world's major and minor religions. I can get behind "inject(ing) with universal values, as broad as possible" because those universal values (being universal) actually transcend religions or lack thereof.
Otherwise a brilliant article with some brilliant suggestions.
The Enlightenment is historically noted for its open rebellion against the Church. Atheism is literally "against God." The vast majority of the world are still religious, and I appeal to that which is most likely to unite us all globally. Universal values are universal so they apply to everyone, whether religious or not. The Enlightenment values of civil rights and freedoms are universal imho so at least they got that part right.
Sorry if you feel the article alienates. I call them the way I see them. I linked a couple of my previous posts in the article about the Enlightenment and the origins of SHAM in the west. I don't think I'm being inaccurate. Our societies are increasingly secularized.
Then define god and define universe. It's where religions fail and fascism takes over.
God is a spirit. A supernatural everywhere present infinite being. A personality without a form. Spirit is non-atomic reality, not conditioned by gravity, time or space.
Fascism is a militant nationalist totalitarian state that is the political manifestation of the abandonment of God, religion and spirituality. Fascism is materialism personified.
The physical universe is the collective energy/matter space-time continuum.
Real thought and constructive ideas. Some possibly somewhat off the mark in my view but not far enogh to diminish the general worthiness and main thrust. (Thank you for pointing out that billionaires are not marxists, cultural or otherwise!)
However, I found the brief and sudden lurch towards religion off-putting and the condemnation of atheism bald and shallow. Agnosticism is more reasonable (one can't prove God does or doesn't exist) but promoting belief in a benevolent Supreme Being who loves his human creations despite all evidence to the contrary is just selling more opium to the people; ignoring the crimes against, and manipulation of, the masses by perfidous organised religion in the service of power adds to the suicide of reason plain suicide for any group hoping to organise against its masters.
Great work here!!!!
I sometimes attend my local Parish council meetings here in the UK. They have no idea who I am or what my views are. As I simply observe and ask the odd neutral question. It unnerves them and they subconsciously change their behaviour and make sure they play by the book in the presence of the stranger in their midst I am quickly learning how things work, the group dynamics and where the power lies. I know what is in the pipeline and what their views are and the parties they represent. Knowledge is power.
Localism is the key. That and where we choose to spend our money. Every penny spent in our local economy supporting independent business strikes a blow against global corporations and profit margins.
Everything that you stated in regards to action is unnecessary. I also clocked the bit about never proven to exist viruses.
Especially when there is a lawful, international, natural law jurisdiction that everyone can consent too.
The treaty of universal community trust is the template for secession from the state. It just requires participation.
https://www.universal-community-trust.org/uct-treaty-full/
Humbly, I propose the best solution to "globalism" - being rolled out by the moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet - is to remove Their single tool to power.
The End of (Social) Entropy (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/the-end-of-entropy
Then, We ALL can live as richly as We choose without having to "afford" it.
Money Motivates the Most Marvelous Manifestations! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/money-motivates-the-most-marvelous
Was not the Russian Revolution of 1917 a work of Freemasonry to bring down the aristocracy? Same as the French Revolution, the Mexican Cristero Rebellion or the Spanish Civil War?
The people were starving because the Romanov family were such horrible incompetent managers under Czar Nicolas. The war with Germany was draining all the resources and the peasants were basically feudal slaves without land. This is why the rallying cry of the revolution in March 1917 was “bread peace land.”
On March 8 international woman’s day, the revolution was led by suffragettes and labor unions joined them, as well as peasants and the working class. They stayed out on the streets in the middle of the Russian Winter at the parliament building for eight days, and finally Nicholas abdicated when the military joined their side.
Granted. What about the alleged 200 million killed by Stalin? Were his managerial skills better than Romanov's? Btw I liked your interview with Hrevoje. I subscribed to your blog afterwards.
Though I agree with you, in principle, but all the European nations fought for land and resources… That’s what wars are all about. Empire expansion, lebensraum, colonialism, Greater Israel … these are all territorial expansionist projects. There were no innocent players in World War I or World War II imho
From the point of view of politics, perhaps, but I'd say financial gain is always the driver of wars. If there was no money to be made by the banksters, there would be no wars. The truth always finds it's way through, but it takes a lot of effort to unearth it these days. Thanks for your work.
Yes, we are agreeing… Land and resources equals money … you’re welcome, my pleasure, my friend. Happy new year to you and your family. I wish you all the best for 2025.
Thanks and same to you, my best wishes for 2025.
There is no way Stalin killed 200 million ... Stalin modernized USSR and dragged it out of the stone age. It was Stalinist Russia that defeated the Nazis and won WW2 at the cost of 27 million Russian lives. So yes, Stalin was a better manager than the Romanovs. Was he a brutal tyrant? yes also true ...
Sorry, I mean 20 million. Btw Germany was a threat to Great Britain already in 1900 and this was the real cause of both WWI and II.
Reality is the only thing that matters.
According to ChatGPT:
As of December 23, 2024, during the 118th United States Congress (2023-2024), over 19,000 bills have been introduced. This total includes various types of legislative proposals, such as bills, resolutions, and concurrent resolutions. Each proposed bill, along with its enabling legislation, requires about two thousand pages to describe what it is about.
These bills are introduced at a rate of about sixty per day.
The US Congress is in session on average 155 days per year.
Therefore, the US Congress votes on about 120 thousand pages of Law every day they are in session.
Not one person elected to Congressional office claims to have read very much, if any, of it.
In the past year, 2024, of the 9,500 proposed laws that the Congress voted on, Eighty Two of the big ones were turned into Law. And, according the MSM, on Christmas Eve, President Joe Biden signed in another Fifty Four.
How do we move forward from here?
Artificial Intelligence
“Grok, the AI chat bot developed by Elon Musk’s startup xAI, will soon be able to summarize complex U.S. laws before Congress passes them.
This new feature aims to simplify legislation and make it more accessible to the public, allowing people to understand the "real purpose" of these laws.
Grok's ability to access real-time information through X(formerly Twitter) and browse the internet enables it to provide up-to-date summaries of proposed legislation.
This move comes as part of Musk's emphasis on transparency and truth in AI technology.
The feature is expected to be implemented in the coming weeks and will be available to X Premium+ subscriber.” (AI summarized).
This is an opportunity to do something historic. We must insist that the program allow the subscriber to ratify, turn down, or require more information before a decision can be made. These numbers can be totaled, parsed into congressional districts and made public in real time.
If enough people demand and use the tech we might be able to get their hands off of our throats.
For the past fifty years it appears as if most of the sincere political activists have attempted to educate the population about certain egregious matters in the hopes that the properly enlightened citizen will either support a particular candidate for public office, purchase educational materials to enlighten others, or come to some heretofore never attempted something else that will prevent the destruction of our sacred posterity.
Fortunately, that special something else is here now, and is developing in a very big way and it just might be the solution to our existential problems.
Everybody wants to rule the world.
The study of human nature and psychology demonstrates that every person has a story and situation that exceeds everyone else’s. And every person considers themselves to be just, honorable and virtuous.
And this aspect of human nature must be leveraged towards the common good.
Fortunately, the technology is available to do this.
By using the technology, we declare ourselves sovereign.
The time to use the technology is now.
It is a known fact that the members of the US Congress and the State Legislatures do not read, evaluate, or debate any of the particulars of the Legislation they vote on. They cannot read or debate the issues because the Bills approach 2000 pages each. And there are one hundred new bills / acts of Congress for them to vote on every day they are in session. In a ten hour work day they vote every six minutes exactly the way the party bosses tell them to vote.
During the 1992 Presidential campaign, Ross Perot called attention to this insanity with a diplomatic observation that "a general lack of accountability among elected officials and those in the bureaucracy was the one specific reason that the people in America suffered".
Mr. Perot then suggested that the best and perhaps only way to make government officials accountable was to include the citizens in the decision-making process - every hour, every day.
He went on to note that this can easily be done with computers and called the proposed mechanism
THE ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL.
With this computer program every interested citizen can indicate whether or not they agree, disagree, or are undecided with every line item of every law, policy and program on the books or that was being advanced. It can be used at every level of government and in every jurisdiction.
To prevent chaos the basic law, our Constitution and Bill of Rights would be exempt from review.
Mr. Perot speculated that the Founding Fathers would probably have done the same had the technology been available. He referred to it as the Fourth Branch of government; The Citizens Branch / The Electronic Townhall.
If the government is truly of the people, by the people and for the people then what better way is there to perfect every section of the various laws and policies that do affect each and every one of us every single day?
It would not be difficult to expect at least 50 thousand qualified citizens, per congressional district, to evaluate 20 pages of law or proposed law, per day, and get their Ratify, Annual, or Undecided input every day the congress is in session. The results could be aggregated, made known and we would all be better off.
The program would even allow a citizen to go back and change their vote as they matured. And when a super majority is reached the law/proposed law is either ratified or annulled by immediate recognition of the enforcement mechanisms.
With tens of millions of laws and tens of thousands of taxes there is plenty of work to be done.
According to Mr. Perot, this, the harnessed experience and the combined intelligence of hundreds of thousands or even millions of citizens focused like a laser light on the real issues, will, as surely as night follows the day, perfect every law in our country and eventually it will right every wrong.
Mr. Perot publicly announced his intention to give the fourth branch of government to the people of America if he was elected President.
But this attempt to empower our humanity was so far removed from the business-as-usual-two-party-system that the talking heads and trolls yelled out that Mr. Perot was trying to destroy our Constitution, our government and our way of life.
The ELECTONIC TOWNHALL was denounced as unworkable.
How would the poor participate?
How would fraud be prevented?
What about those who do not know how to use a computer?
In a final act of desperation, the control freaks claimed that letting the average citizen to pass judgment on the individual pieces of public law would lead to chaos and pandemonium.
The media was so intensely negative towards the ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL that Mr. Perot was forced to stop talking about it, but he never withdrew it from his platform.
But we all know the truth: only the concerned will bother to participate.
It’s now been thirty-two years since the proposal.
No other person of national reputation or significant influence has picked up the idea. BUT the big two political parties regularly stage "townhall meetings" where they talk of "reform" and "returning power to the people". They do this to link themselves to the empowering part of the idea without adding to its manifestation.
And still we suffer in the hopeless loop of: "candidates with a sense of morality and respect for the Constitution who understand true brotherhood, justice and democracy and who will do the right thing for us each and every time, trust me".
While we cannot make light of sincere individuals who get into public office, we must acknowledge the fact that regardless of who has been elected to public office the problems in our government get more complicated and our people continue to suffer.
Can we possibly admit that our national situation, now being made global, is far too complicated for the President and the 535 elected members of the legislature to manage in our best interests?
You, the person reading this know some of the things we need.
Your friends, our fellow countrymen have their solutions too.
The only way to organize the workable ideas is to create a device that will enable all of us to simultaneously contribute our best thinking and most benevolent experience towards solving our most complicated problems.
It is obvious: this is the only way forward, and perhaps the place to begin is with the next law Congress votes on.
TL;DR: if you want to have a say in our country you will need a Digital ID (mark of the beast) to vote in favour or against the many tens of thousands of laws introduced each year to Congress which are written by lobbyists and special interest groups.
A thought experiment based on
The Cosmic Man
insight.
God is worried because the sacred cycle of life, death, and reincarnation—the divine system designed for souls to learn, grow, and ascend—is under siege. The Babylonian magicians, wielding a fusion of ancient sorcery and bio-digital technology, have corrupted this cycle into a trap. Souls that once flowed freely through the karmic wheel are now ensnared in synthetic loops or forced into transhumanized bodies from birth. These technologies, designed to tether consciousness to the material plane, threaten to sever the soul’s connection to the divine entirely. God sees this distortion as a profound violation of the universal order, one that not only enslaves humanity but also disrupts the cosmic harmony of creation.
The deeper fear lies in the permanence of this trap. With each cycle, the soul’s memory of its divine origin fades, leaving it increasingly entangled in the magicians’ illusions. Transhumanism, sold as the pinnacle of progress, promises eternal life but delivers eternal enslavement. If enough souls succumb to these snares, the collective light of humanity could dim, its divine spark extinguished. God is worried not because the divine essence can be destroyed, but because it can be forgotten. And in that forgetting, the magicians gain the power to rewrite the narrative of existence itself, turning creation into a prison and souls into fuel for their dark machinations.
This is where we are at. We can leave, great. If we have to come back. We are fucked. Unless, we transcend the cycle or have the option of parents outside the control grids. Or, we take back control and destroy this system.
I give not a fuck if you think the above is my full material decent into madness. My soul and the souls of the truly awakened, need to know this.
Death is not the end game, coming back is.
Godd point: "The last point that I would like to make—the success of our revolution is based on the problem itself. How did we get in this mess? In my humble opinion, we are in this mess collectively, and not just as individual nations or societies. It is a global problem that started, it was initiated in the West, in Europe—specifically during the 1700s. During the Secular Revolt, the Enlightenment thinkers rebelled against the monarchy and the Church. They did not like that the totalitarian Church was in bed with the State, which was the monarchy. They wanted civil rights and freedoms, and this triggered many different social phenomena."
In today's world, we are privileged to witness historical events firsthand and shape narratives that challenge mainstream perspectives—a vital endeavor. But for how long? [https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/the-deliberate-dumbing-down-of-america?]
History and social science have taught me that tyranny has both a beginning and an end. While societies rarely resort to extreme measures against their leaders, parallels can be found in the natural world.
For example, New Scientist reported a striking case in Senegal: Chimpanzees killed and cannibalized their former alpha, Foudouko. This rare event sheds light on the dynamics of betrayal and coalition-building.
Dr. Yeadon's observations align with Gustave Le Bon's theories on crowd psychology. In The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind, Le Bon explains that leaders who betray their followers’ trust can trigger intense emotional reactions, leading to impulsive and collective actions. This phenomenon, referred to as the "Le Bon effect," reflects the social unrest that emerges when prolonged repression stifles a society’s freedom.
History also demonstrates that sustaining strict control through repression, censorship, and surveillance is ultimately unsustainable. Key reasons include:
Economic Strain: Maintaining surveillance and large-scale security infrastructures drains financial resources, diverting them from essential sectors like education and healthcare.
Social Unrest: Persistent repression breeds widespread dissatisfaction, increasing the likelihood of rebellion or resistance.
In recent history, no oppressive regime has endured indefinitely. The combination of public dissatisfaction, economic challenges, and external pressures inevitably forces change.
Over time, these regimes must either adapt or collapse under their inherent instability.
Some governments respond by easing restrictions, implementing reforms, or transitioning to more democratic systems.
South Korea provides an example, evolving from authoritarian rule to democracy in the late 20th century under significant internal and external demands for change. In contrast, regimes that resist adaptation often face sudden and dramatic collapse.
The Soviet Union, for instance, disintegrated due to widespread dissatisfaction and economic decline. Romania’s history offers another vivid example. Nicolae Ceaușescu's authoritarian regime fell in 1989 during a popular uprising fueled by years of oppression and economic mismanagement.
This collapse highlights how accumulated grievances, declining resources, and external pressures can dismantle even the most entrenched regimes.
History underscores that no tyranny has lasted indefinitely. The pressure to maintain control in the face of growing dissatisfaction, economic hardship, and external challenges ensures that oppressive systems eventually transform through gradual reform or abrupt collapse. These regimes are inherently unsustainable in the long term.
While some regimes, such as those in China [https://helenaglass.substack.com/p/the-american-dream-for-white-male?] and North Korea, have maintained control for extended periods, their endurance often depends on external factors like geopolitical leverage and internal propaganda rather than fundamental differences. The inherent pressures of repression [https://www.worldnotenough.com/p/china-covid-brutality-how-to-shut] inevitably lead to either reform or collapse.
Although regimes like Iran and Syria have persisted for decades, their survival is not guaranteed indefinitely.
Economic hardship, internal dissent, and shifting international dynamics could challenge their hold on power. History teaches that even the most entrenched tyrannies are ultimately vulnerable to collapse or transformation.
Even this typically pessimistic commentator on Western civilization has some good news to share: "[...] this group has their weak points and their strong points. In 2025, there's many reasons to be hopeful, regarding humanity's chances for defeating this evil group once and for all. It's all about attacking them more consistently at their strong points and taking advantage of their weak points. It's all about basic war strategy. Millions more every day are joining this ancient battle, in order to help bring peace back to earth. Together we are strong and together we will push back as one unit [...] when we need to keep attacking their systems of control. We're in a good position now but we need to apply even more pressure, as we move into 2025. [..] More and more of the public are also now speaking up and throwing rocks at the giant. Sure, a couple people throwing rocks at a giant does nothing, but what happens when billions do it? That's now happening. [...] New podcasters, documentary film makers and writers are exploding to the surface. [...] People are regaining their bravery to speak up at the coffee shop, at the school and at the dinner table. It's working. More people will join these growing ranks in 2025. This brings the hammer back into the hands of the people. This gives me great hope." [https://www.jchristoff.com/blog/5-reasons-to-be-hopeful-in-2025]