Hi, thanks for your insights. I spent 10 years studying the origins of the global domination project and came to slightly different conclusions, which are summarized in my book well documented book The Predators versus The People, available on https://thepredatorsversusthepeople.substack.com/
Some of the main differences are:
- the world has been globalized for approx. 5000 years
- some very rich people in the Mediterranean (from Venice, Genoa and Jews banned from Spain) started the present project about 500 years ago. I call them the Predators or Glafia (the richest dynastic families in the world, mostly bankers and royalty, maybe a few 100).
- they made the upcoming European nations states their proxies by fusing their mobile capital with the governments (central banking, bribery, investments)
- from the start, their proxy states (by now all countries in the world) were European and overseen by designated hegemons, resp. Spain, Holland, Britain and the USA. Since over a century (Russia and) China were set up as their fifth hegemon, the first time that they use an Asian proxy for this task.
- their present proxy system is very complicated (governments, big corporations, national and international institutions, NGO's, churches, secret societies, etc, etc) and will be replaced by a technological control system (the Global Digital Prison, or Digital Gulag).
For a first look, please consult my free articles on the history of China, the USA, Russia, and Jewry on the above mentioned site.
I am not sure how you can conclude the world has been globalized for 5000 years. There is no archeological record to support this conclusion. The rest of your summary seems in line with the Larouche cult. Thanks for your comments though. You must be friends with Iurie Roșca. I’m sure I’ve seen him advertising your book.
When you open the site you will also find a review by Iurie Rosca, who highly praises my book.
The Larouche group did some great research on the early phases of the present global domination project (e.g. On Oligarchy by Webster Tarpley, and several articles on the Venetian and Dutch role which I mention in my book). Yet they tremendously distort the American phase of the project, which is now ending with the fake multipolar world order led by China, led by the same international gangsters, which they applaud (Matthew Ehret, etc).
OK so we’re in agreement about LAROUCHE… The silk roads took a year for a caravan to travel so this idea of globalization existing 5000 or even 500 years ago is not really accurate. Unless you’re using an extremely broad definition of globalization. The globalization that I’m referring to exists because of science and technology. Rapid transportation, through car rail and airplane has made trade extremely fast and efficient in comparison to camels lumbering across the desert of ancient times. We also have instantaneous communication which never existed, previous to the modern age. In former times if you sent a letter from London to Beijing, it may never get there or at the very least would take at least a year and then another year to get a response.
Hi, thanks for your insights. I spent 10 years studying the origins of the global domination project and came to slightly different conclusions, which are summarized in my book well documented book The Predators versus The People, available on https://thepredatorsversusthepeople.substack.com/
Some of the main differences are:
- the world has been globalized for approx. 5000 years
- some very rich people in the Mediterranean (from Venice, Genoa and Jews banned from Spain) started the present project about 500 years ago. I call them the Predators or Glafia (the richest dynastic families in the world, mostly bankers and royalty, maybe a few 100).
- they made the upcoming European nations states their proxies by fusing their mobile capital with the governments (central banking, bribery, investments)
- from the start, their proxy states (by now all countries in the world) were European and overseen by designated hegemons, resp. Spain, Holland, Britain and the USA. Since over a century (Russia and) China were set up as their fifth hegemon, the first time that they use an Asian proxy for this task.
- their present proxy system is very complicated (governments, big corporations, national and international institutions, NGO's, churches, secret societies, etc, etc) and will be replaced by a technological control system (the Global Digital Prison, or Digital Gulag).
For a first look, please consult my free articles on the history of China, the USA, Russia, and Jewry on the above mentioned site.
I am not sure how you can conclude the world has been globalized for 5000 years. There is no archeological record to support this conclusion. The rest of your summary seems in line with the Larouche cult. Thanks for your comments though. You must be friends with Iurie Roșca. I’m sure I’ve seen him advertising your book.
Hi 009
i tried to reply early January, but for some reason it did not work.
On early globalization, I refer you to two of my book chapters on my site thepredatorsversusthepeople.substack.com, A1.3 and A1.4, under book preview.
When you open the site you will also find a review by Iurie Rosca, who highly praises my book.
The Larouche group did some great research on the early phases of the present global domination project (e.g. On Oligarchy by Webster Tarpley, and several articles on the Venetian and Dutch role which I mention in my book). Yet they tremendously distort the American phase of the project, which is now ending with the fake multipolar world order led by China, led by the same international gangsters, which they applaud (Matthew Ehret, etc).
OK so we’re in agreement about LAROUCHE… The silk roads took a year for a caravan to travel so this idea of globalization existing 5000 or even 500 years ago is not really accurate. Unless you’re using an extremely broad definition of globalization. The globalization that I’m referring to exists because of science and technology. Rapid transportation, through car rail and airplane has made trade extremely fast and efficient in comparison to camels lumbering across the desert of ancient times. We also have instantaneous communication which never existed, previous to the modern age. In former times if you sent a letter from London to Beijing, it may never get there or at the very least would take at least a year and then another year to get a response.