Can I just clarify, for anyone who may think the term 'vampires', is emotive; the uber wealthy do actually believe that transfusions of 'young blood' will keep them young. They literally are vampires.
From Wikipedia:
Young blood transfusion refers to transfusing blood specifically from a young person into an older one with the intention of creating a health benefit.[1] The efficacy and safety of young blood transfusions for anti-aging purposes remain a subject of debate in the scientific community, with limited clinical evidence in humans.[1][2][3] There are also concerns of harm.[3] While some preclinical studies on animals suggest potential benefits, there is a lack of robust clinical evidence to support its use in humans.[4][5][6][7][8][9] The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, in 2019, cautioned "consumers against receiving young donor plasma infusions" stating that they are an "unproven treatment".[3]
In today's world, we are privileged to witness historical events firsthand and shape narratives that challenge mainstream perspectives—a vital endeavor. But for how long? [https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/the-deliberate-dumbing-down-of-america?] History and social science have taught me that tyranny has both a beginning and an end. While societies rarely resort to extreme measures against their leaders, parallels can be found in the natural world. For example, New Scientist reported a striking case in Senegal: Chimpanzees killed and cannibalized their former alpha, Foudouko. This rare event sheds light on the dynamics of betrayal and coalition-building. Dr. Yeadon's observations align with Gustave Le Bon's theories on crowd psychology. In The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind, Le Bon explains that leaders who betray their followers’ trust can trigger intense emotional reactions, leading to impulsive and collective actions. This phenomenon, referred to as the "Le Bon effect," reflects the social unrest that emerges when prolonged repression stifles a society’s freedom. History also demonstrates that sustaining strict control through repression, censorship, and surveillance is ultimately unsustainable. Key reasons include: Economic Strain: Maintaining surveillance and large-scale security infrastructures drains financial resources, diverting them from essential sectors like education and healthcare. Social Unrest: Persistent repression breeds widespread dissatisfaction, increasing the likelihood of rebellion or resistance. In recent history, no oppressive regime has endured indefinitely. The combination of public dissatisfaction, economic challenges, and external pressures inevitably forces change. Over time, these regimes must either adapt or collapse under their inherent instability. Some governments respond by easing restrictions, implementing reforms, or transitioning to more democratic systems. South Korea provides an example, evolving from authoritarian rule to democracy in the late 20th century under significant internal and external demands for change. In contrast, regimes that resist adaptation often face sudden and dramatic collapse. The Soviet Union, for instance, disintegrated due to widespread dissatisfaction and economic decline. Romania’s history offers another vivid example. Nicolae Ceaușescu's authoritarian regime fell in 1989 during a popular uprising fueled by years of oppression and economic mismanagement. This collapse highlights how accumulated grievances, declining resources, and external pressures can dismantle even the most entrenched regimes. History underscores that no tyranny has lasted indefinitely. The pressure to maintain control in the face of growing dissatisfaction, economic hardship, and external challenges ensures that oppressive systems eventually transform through gradual reform or abrupt collapse. These regimes are inherently unsustainable in the long term. While some regimes, such as those in China [https://helenaglass.substack.com/p/the-american-dream-for-white-male?] and North Korea, have maintained control for extended periods, their endurance often depends on external factors like geopolitical leverage and internal propaganda rather than fundamental differences. The inherent pressures of repression [https://www.worldnotenough.com/p/china-covid-brutality-how-to-shut] inevitably lead to either reform or collapse. Although regimes like Iran and Syria have persisted for decades, their survival is not guaranteed indefinitely. Economic hardship, internal dissent, and shifting international dynamics could challenge their hold on power. History teaches that even the most entrenched tyrannies are ultimately vulnerable to collapse or transformation. Even this typically pessimistic commentator on Western civilization has some good news to share: "[...] this group has their weak points and their strong points. In 2025, there's many reasons to be hopeful, regarding humanity's chances for defeating this evil group once and for all. It's all about attacking them more consistently at their strong points and taking advantage of their weak points. It's all about basic war strategy. Millions more every day are joining this ancient battle, in order to help bring peace back to earth. Together we are strong and together we will push back as one unit [...] when we need to keep attacking their systems of control. We're in a good position now but we need to apply even more pressure, as we move into 2025. [..] More and more of the public are also now speaking up and throwing rocks at the giant. Sure, a couple people throwing rocks at a giant does nothing, but what happens when billions do it? That's now happening. [...] New podcasters, documentary film makers and writers are exploding to the surface. [...] People are regaining their bravery to speak up at the coffee shop, at the school and at the dinner table. It's working. More people will join these growing ranks in 2025. This brings the hammer back into the hands of the people. This gives me great hope." [https://www.jchristoff.com/blog/5-reasons-to-be-hopeful-in-2025]
How can i tell u my story about how the hospital and my family accelerated my fathers death? Euthanizing him this weekend, against his wish for a natural death.
The Black pill tells me the last 4-5 years were merely a live fire test to check out their methods and processes, tie up loose ends. The next 4-5 years will be the real show to get the population down between 1-2 billion peeps. Most think it is over and they are just getting started.
Hi 009,
Can I just clarify, for anyone who may think the term 'vampires', is emotive; the uber wealthy do actually believe that transfusions of 'young blood' will keep them young. They literally are vampires.
From Wikipedia:
Young blood transfusion refers to transfusing blood specifically from a young person into an older one with the intention of creating a health benefit.[1] The efficacy and safety of young blood transfusions for anti-aging purposes remain a subject of debate in the scientific community, with limited clinical evidence in humans.[1][2][3] There are also concerns of harm.[3] While some preclinical studies on animals suggest potential benefits, there is a lack of robust clinical evidence to support its use in humans.[4][5][6][7][8][9] The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, in 2019, cautioned "consumers against receiving young donor plasma infusions" stating that they are an "unproven treatment".[3]
Newsweek:
https://www.newsweek.com/2021/04/16/can-blood-young-people-slow-aging-silicon-valley-has-bet-billions-it-will-1581447.html
Some even draining blood from their own children.
https://nypost.com/2023/05/22/anti-aging-fanatic-who-spends-2m-a-year-to-retain-youth-uses-teen-son-as-blood-boy/
Seriously. These people are insane. Yet they get away with it because money is power.
Blessings,
Janey
In today's world, we are privileged to witness historical events firsthand and shape narratives that challenge mainstream perspectives—a vital endeavor. But for how long? [https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/the-deliberate-dumbing-down-of-america?] History and social science have taught me that tyranny has both a beginning and an end. While societies rarely resort to extreme measures against their leaders, parallels can be found in the natural world. For example, New Scientist reported a striking case in Senegal: Chimpanzees killed and cannibalized their former alpha, Foudouko. This rare event sheds light on the dynamics of betrayal and coalition-building. Dr. Yeadon's observations align with Gustave Le Bon's theories on crowd psychology. In The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind, Le Bon explains that leaders who betray their followers’ trust can trigger intense emotional reactions, leading to impulsive and collective actions. This phenomenon, referred to as the "Le Bon effect," reflects the social unrest that emerges when prolonged repression stifles a society’s freedom. History also demonstrates that sustaining strict control through repression, censorship, and surveillance is ultimately unsustainable. Key reasons include: Economic Strain: Maintaining surveillance and large-scale security infrastructures drains financial resources, diverting them from essential sectors like education and healthcare. Social Unrest: Persistent repression breeds widespread dissatisfaction, increasing the likelihood of rebellion or resistance. In recent history, no oppressive regime has endured indefinitely. The combination of public dissatisfaction, economic challenges, and external pressures inevitably forces change. Over time, these regimes must either adapt or collapse under their inherent instability. Some governments respond by easing restrictions, implementing reforms, or transitioning to more democratic systems. South Korea provides an example, evolving from authoritarian rule to democracy in the late 20th century under significant internal and external demands for change. In contrast, regimes that resist adaptation often face sudden and dramatic collapse. The Soviet Union, for instance, disintegrated due to widespread dissatisfaction and economic decline. Romania’s history offers another vivid example. Nicolae Ceaușescu's authoritarian regime fell in 1989 during a popular uprising fueled by years of oppression and economic mismanagement. This collapse highlights how accumulated grievances, declining resources, and external pressures can dismantle even the most entrenched regimes. History underscores that no tyranny has lasted indefinitely. The pressure to maintain control in the face of growing dissatisfaction, economic hardship, and external challenges ensures that oppressive systems eventually transform through gradual reform or abrupt collapse. These regimes are inherently unsustainable in the long term. While some regimes, such as those in China [https://helenaglass.substack.com/p/the-american-dream-for-white-male?] and North Korea, have maintained control for extended periods, their endurance often depends on external factors like geopolitical leverage and internal propaganda rather than fundamental differences. The inherent pressures of repression [https://www.worldnotenough.com/p/china-covid-brutality-how-to-shut] inevitably lead to either reform or collapse. Although regimes like Iran and Syria have persisted for decades, their survival is not guaranteed indefinitely. Economic hardship, internal dissent, and shifting international dynamics could challenge their hold on power. History teaches that even the most entrenched tyrannies are ultimately vulnerable to collapse or transformation. Even this typically pessimistic commentator on Western civilization has some good news to share: "[...] this group has their weak points and their strong points. In 2025, there's many reasons to be hopeful, regarding humanity's chances for defeating this evil group once and for all. It's all about attacking them more consistently at their strong points and taking advantage of their weak points. It's all about basic war strategy. Millions more every day are joining this ancient battle, in order to help bring peace back to earth. Together we are strong and together we will push back as one unit [...] when we need to keep attacking their systems of control. We're in a good position now but we need to apply even more pressure, as we move into 2025. [..] More and more of the public are also now speaking up and throwing rocks at the giant. Sure, a couple people throwing rocks at a giant does nothing, but what happens when billions do it? That's now happening. [...] New podcasters, documentary film makers and writers are exploding to the surface. [...] People are regaining their bravery to speak up at the coffee shop, at the school and at the dinner table. It's working. More people will join these growing ranks in 2025. This brings the hammer back into the hands of the people. This gives me great hope." [https://www.jchristoff.com/blog/5-reasons-to-be-hopeful-in-2025]
How can i tell u my story about how the hospital and my family accelerated my fathers death? Euthanizing him this weekend, against his wish for a natural death.
The Black pill tells me the last 4-5 years were merely a live fire test to check out their methods and processes, tie up loose ends. The next 4-5 years will be the real show to get the population down between 1-2 billion peeps. Most think it is over and they are just getting started.