One point: Your dismissal of Ryan Poe’s work seems like a hand wave:
“Other elaborate historical revisions, like Richard Poe’s How the British Invented Communism (And Blamed It on the Jews), are equally unconvincing.”
I read Poe’s book and found it plausible and intriguing; especially the British role in the FR. And subsequent color revolutions. Historian Matthew Ehret takes a similar point of view. Can you point me to a deeper critique of Poe’s work that supports your interpretation?
It would be a separate article to give you a fair answer, and I have considered doing one about Richard Poe and Matt Ehret's take on Zionism, the French Revolution and communism, though much of that I already mentioned in my article. The historical record shows it was the French who began the intellectual path to communism and secondly, it was German Bavarians who partnered with them, not the British.
The problem with Richard Poe, Matt Ehret and their intellectual mentor Lyndon Larouche's theory of the British Empire ruling the world is that the British Empire does not exist any more and has not existed since the end of WW2. The Larouche cult seems to have forgotten that Britain lost all it colonies and the USA became the leading superpower. Please check out my latest article if you are interested:
Let me work on a rebuttal of Richard Poe's book, thank you for your thoughtful questions. Here is an additional source, probably the quintessential work on the origins of the Illuminati, Jacobins etc ... including a detailed list of 400 of the original members, virtually zero British members and only one Jewish member, Moses Mendelssohn.
Very enjoyable. I especially enjoyed the cover of writers like Barruel and Webster. I’d like to suggest that the FR was the first political instance of the mutability of human nature (via Locke and Helvétius) expressed as régénération. This has served as an excuse for mass slaughter ever since: no price is too high for the elevation to a new type of human being.
Thank you for this very good review of the French revolution and how it's the forerunner for the Great Reset. I'm able to offer an alternative theory that's (indirectly) in line with yours. There's a cycle that comes around every 256 years that results in the collapse - or reordering - of civilisations.
The French Revolution, the Collapse of Easter Island, Rome's Crisis of the Third Century, the Aztec Empire Collapse and the American Revolution all happened during the final 20 years of this recurring cycle. The next time that the recurring 20-year time frame comes around again is starting in 2032:
Thank you for this interesting read. I also liked this investigation into the FR that posits that the way it is commonly depicted is inaccurate and that the revolutionaries were actually not at all part of the working class or peasants but were mostly upper middle class, almost all of them being lawyers and capitalists, and shows that they actually HIJACKED the revolutionary aspirations of the working class that were brewing prior to the revolution and instead supressed the possibility of a truly free society. A fascinating read, IMHO
Something else just occurred to me... they want us to rebel! They need us to in order to complete their goal of chaos and disorder to come in and be in total control. They have been studying our ways for a long time! And in a podcast I recently came across the notion that all revolution in history have actually had their roots in mysticism. The whole earth if filled with a mish mash of pegan/religion solders, most unaware even to their position and hand in what is taking place
Excellent. Especially the closing paragraphs.
One point: Your dismissal of Ryan Poe’s work seems like a hand wave:
“Other elaborate historical revisions, like Richard Poe’s How the British Invented Communism (And Blamed It on the Jews), are equally unconvincing.”
I read Poe’s book and found it plausible and intriguing; especially the British role in the FR. And subsequent color revolutions. Historian Matthew Ehret takes a similar point of view. Can you point me to a deeper critique of Poe’s work that supports your interpretation?
It would be a separate article to give you a fair answer, and I have considered doing one about Richard Poe and Matt Ehret's take on Zionism, the French Revolution and communism, though much of that I already mentioned in my article. The historical record shows it was the French who began the intellectual path to communism and secondly, it was German Bavarians who partnered with them, not the British.
check out my previous article:
https://www.worldnotenough.com/p/bavarians-jacobins-and-vampires-the
The problem with Richard Poe, Matt Ehret and their intellectual mentor Lyndon Larouche's theory of the British Empire ruling the world is that the British Empire does not exist any more and has not existed since the end of WW2. The Larouche cult seems to have forgotten that Britain lost all it colonies and the USA became the leading superpower. Please check out my latest article if you are interested:
https://www.worldnotenough.com/p/america-owns-everything-but-who-owns
Let me work on a rebuttal of Richard Poe's book, thank you for your thoughtful questions. Here is an additional source, probably the quintessential work on the origins of the Illuminati, Jacobins etc ... including a detailed list of 400 of the original members, virtually zero British members and only one Jewish member, Moses Mendelssohn.
https://archive.org/details/perfectibilists-the-18th-century-bavarian-order-of-the-illuminati-9781937584092-1937584097_compress/page/n293/mode/2up
Very enjoyable. I especially enjoyed the cover of writers like Barruel and Webster. I’d like to suggest that the FR was the first political instance of the mutability of human nature (via Locke and Helvétius) expressed as régénération. This has served as an excuse for mass slaughter ever since: no price is too high for the elevation to a new type of human being.
Thank you for this very good review of the French revolution and how it's the forerunner for the Great Reset. I'm able to offer an alternative theory that's (indirectly) in line with yours. There's a cycle that comes around every 256 years that results in the collapse - or reordering - of civilisations.
The French Revolution, the Collapse of Easter Island, Rome's Crisis of the Third Century, the Aztec Empire Collapse and the American Revolution all happened during the final 20 years of this recurring cycle. The next time that the recurring 20-year time frame comes around again is starting in 2032:
https://energyshifts.net/the-cyclic-reordering-of-civilizations/
Thank you for this interesting read. I also liked this investigation into the FR that posits that the way it is commonly depicted is inaccurate and that the revolutionaries were actually not at all part of the working class or peasants but were mostly upper middle class, almost all of them being lawyers and capitalists, and shows that they actually HIJACKED the revolutionary aspirations of the working class that were brewing prior to the revolution and instead supressed the possibility of a truly free society. A fascinating read, IMHO
https://johnspritzler.substack.com/p/the-1789-french-revolutionaries-treated
"We are all brothers and sisters, part of an ever-evolving, progressive cosmic plan, coordinated, created and orchestrated by the Master Planner."
Sounds good. However, what proof do we have of that?
Something else just occurred to me... they want us to rebel! They need us to in order to complete their goal of chaos and disorder to come in and be in total control. They have been studying our ways for a long time! And in a podcast I recently came across the notion that all revolution in history have actually had their roots in mysticism. The whole earth if filled with a mish mash of pegan/religion solders, most unaware even to their position and hand in what is taking place